* Re: Any chance to get Apache 2.0.xx working on cygwin?
[not found] ` <20050616212135.GB11157@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
@ 2005-06-17 3:23 ` One Angry User
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: One Angry User @ 2005-06-17 3:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The Cygwin-Talk Maligning List
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor's computer deigned to emit the following stream of bytes:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Andreas Eibach wrote:
> >cygwin@cygwin.com schrieb am 16.06.05 17:03:10:
>
> Actually, that was cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com who schrieb:
Hehe...
> >>>site:cygwin.com inurl:cygwin inurl:ml <query words here>
> >>>
> >>>You can even use more "inurl:"s to restrict by year/month since those
> >>>are part of the URL. In addition, the list is archived at many other
> >>>places, all of which have searches. Three that come to mind are
> >>>gmane.org, marc.theaimsgroup.com, and mail-archive.com.
> >>
> >>I'm glad that someone finally suggested this. I think a few more
> >>messages along these lines would have surely kick started a mean
> >>response from me.
> >
> >Pity it didn't come. I would have been able to answer accordingly,
> >mind you. I cannot understand why you are always so short-tempered if
> >someone reports a problem. But if you want war, you get war if need
> >be.
>
> Can't talk now. I'm digging trenches.
Those won't save you from falling hippos. :-p
OAU
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread