* Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd @ 2011-08-24 15:07 Ronald Fischer 2011-08-24 15:15 ` Eliot Moss ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Ronald Fischer @ 2011-08-24 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin I would like to run cmd.exe within a rxvt terminal on Windows 7. Problem is that calling the cmd.exe command history does not work (it seems that the cursor keys are not passed properly to cmd.exe). In one thread in this mailing list, it was recommended to wrap the rxvt call by rlwrap: rlwrap rxvt -e cmd.exe However, this doesn't solve the problem. Any other suggestions? Maybe any alternative to the standard Windows console? On Windows XP I used the sourceforge-project Console2, but on Windows 7 it crashes so often, that I am looking for a different solution. In particular, I like with rxvt (and with Console2) the ease of copyiing and pasting text, in particular text spanning more than one line. Ronald -- Ronald Fischer <ronaldf@eml.cc> + If a packet hits a pocket on a socket on a port, + and the bus is interrupted and the interrupt's not caught, + then the socket packet pocket has an error to report. + (cited after Peter van der Linden) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd 2011-08-24 15:07 Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd Ronald Fischer @ 2011-08-24 15:15 ` Eliot Moss 2011-08-25 7:34 ` Ronald Fischer 2011-08-24 15:16 ` Charles Wilson 2011-08-24 15:40 ` Andrew DeFaria 2 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Eliot Moss @ 2011-08-24 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin Just a quick thought, but I think you may want to run rlwrap within rxvt, something like: rxvt rlwrap cmd.exe but maybe with some flags, etc. Regards -- ELiot Moss -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd 2011-08-24 15:15 ` Eliot Moss @ 2011-08-25 7:34 ` Ronald Fischer 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Ronald Fischer @ 2011-08-25 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eliot Moss, cygwin On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:15 -0400, "Eliot Moss" <moss@cs.umass.edu> wrote: > Just a quick thought, but I think you may > want to run rlwrap within rxvt, something like: > > rxvt rlwrap cmd.exe Thanks a lot! Indeed, rxvt -e rlwrap cmd Ronald -- Ronald Fischer <ronaldf@eml.cc> + If a packet hits a pocket on a socket on a port, + and the bus is interrupted and the interrupt's not caught, + then the socket packet pocket has an error to report. + (cited after Peter van der Linden) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd 2011-08-24 15:07 Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd Ronald Fischer 2011-08-24 15:15 ` Eliot Moss @ 2011-08-24 15:16 ` Charles Wilson 2011-08-24 15:40 ` Andrew DeFaria 2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Charles Wilson @ 2011-08-24 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On 8/24/2011 11:07 AM, Ronald Fischer wrote: > I would like to run cmd.exe within a rxvt terminal rlwrap is not the problem. Running 'cmd.exe' within rxvt is not possible; cmd.exe expects direct access to the console host (csrss on WinVista-; conhost.exe on Win7+). That is, it expects that functions like those listed here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682073%28v=vs.85%29.aspx such as ReadConsoleInput or WriteConsoleOutput will work. rxvt is not what windows expects as a console host. It is a terminal emulator, and basically communicates with the inferior (bash, etc) via stdio pipes, and unix-style signals. rxvt + cmd.exe won't work. -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd 2011-08-24 15:07 Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd Ronald Fischer 2011-08-24 15:15 ` Eliot Moss 2011-08-24 15:16 ` Charles Wilson @ 2011-08-24 15:40 ` Andrew DeFaria 2011-08-24 15:52 ` Ronald of Steiermark 2 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Andrew DeFaria @ 2011-08-24 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On 08/24/11 08:07, Ronald Fischer wrote: > I would like to run cmd.exe within a rxvt terminal on Windows 7. My question is why? Why do you want to run cmd.exe? > Problem is that calling the cmd.exe command history does not work (it > seems that the cursor keys are not passed properly to cmd.exe). > > In one thread in this mailing list, it was recommended to wrap the > rxvt call by rlwrap: > > rlwrap rxvt -e cmd.exe > > However, this doesn't solve the problem. > > Any other suggestions? My suggestion would be to abandon cmd.exe altogether. This is not some smug response or anything like that. Simply put, I have not found a single thing that I need to have cmd.exe around to do it. In fact the only time I go into cmd.exe is to proof to others "See it fails in straight cmd.exe too". I also find the cmd shell and command language inferior in that there's nothing special or even convenient in cmd that can't be done even quicker and better in bash. Now that's a subjective opinion and can be considered smug but it's held with literally years of using Cygwin and Unix/Linux systems together. It's demonstrable that scripts you might develop for bash under Cygwin work equally as well if you simply move them onto say Linux, Solaris, HP-UX, FreeBSD, etc. (sans the obvious non-portable things you might do with Cygwin specific executables like cygpath as well as Windows pathnames or other assumptions. Suffice to say, however, that you can program in that portability). I know - I do it all the time. Given the above I must question again - why do you want to run cmd.exe? > Maybe any alternative to the standard Windows console? On Windows XP I > used the sourceforge-project Console2, but on Windows 7 it crashes so > often, that I am looking for a different solution. > > In particular, I like with rxvt (and with Console2) the ease of > copyiing and pasting text, in particular text spanning more than one > line. I used rxvt for a long time. I too enjoy the copy and paste semantics and the ability to resize the term and it just works correctly. Additionally rxvt pays attention to ~/.Xdefaults settings which is convenient. However I've since switched to mintty. You should check it out. As the other guy said, I don't think that running cmd.exe will work with the arrows because cmd.exe is expecting access to the console in a "Windows way". That said, and if you're hellbent on using cmd.exe, I vaguely recall another terminal emulator program (not a Cygwin thing mind you) called, I believe just "Terminal" (Good luck googling that!) which (insert fuzzy memory here) I believe used a hidden cmd console window to allow the Windows program the proper console environment while translating that to the non-hidden Terminal window. That might work... -- Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com> It's not an optical illusion. It just looks like one. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd 2011-08-24 15:40 ` Andrew DeFaria @ 2011-08-24 15:52 ` Ronald of Steiermark 2011-08-24 15:56 ` Eliot Moss 2011-08-24 16:04 ` Andrew DeFaria 0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Ronald of Steiermark @ 2011-08-24 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew DeFaria, cygwin On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:39 -0700, "Andrew DeFaria" <Andrew@DeFaria.com> wrote: > > I would like to run cmd.exe within a rxvt terminal on Windows 7. > My question is why? Why do you want to run cmd.exe? For instance, to test the cruel BAT files which we are going to deliver. > I also find the cmd shell and command language inferior Language? I wouldn't even call this crap a "language"... > in that there's > nothing special or even convenient in cmd that can't be done even > quicker and better in bash. Yep, though right now I'm fancying zsh. But we are all slaves to those who pay us... > That said, and if you're hellbent on using cmd.exe, I > vaguely recall another terminal emulator program (not a Cygwin thing > mind you) called, I believe just "Terminal" (Good luck googling that!) > which (insert fuzzy memory here) I believe used a hidden cmd console > window to allow the Windows program the proper console environment while > translating that to the non-hidden Terminal window. That might work... Thanks a lot, will look it up. Ronald -- Ronald Fischer <austria_rules@yepmail.net> There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd 2011-08-24 15:52 ` Ronald of Steiermark @ 2011-08-24 15:56 ` Eliot Moss 2011-08-25 7:51 ` Ronald Fischer 2011-08-24 16:04 ` Andrew DeFaria 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Eliot Moss @ 2011-08-24 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On 8/24/2011 11:52 AM, Ronald of Steiermark wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:39 -0700, "Andrew DeFaria"<Andrew@DeFaria.com> > wrote: > For instance, to test the cruel BAT files which we are going to deliver. You can run .bat files from bash and other Cygwin shells. You can also invoke DOS / Windows programs directly. In both cases you generally to present Windows paths, of course; cygpath can help with that. Best -- Eliot Moss -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd 2011-08-24 15:56 ` Eliot Moss @ 2011-08-25 7:51 ` Ronald Fischer 2011-08-25 17:46 ` Andrew DeFaria 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Ronald Fischer @ 2011-08-25 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eliot Moss, cygwin On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:56 -0400, "Eliot Moss" <moss@cs.umass.edu> wrote: > On 8/24/2011 11:52 AM, Ronald of Steiermark wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:39 -0700, "Andrew DeFaria"<Andrew@DeFaria.com> > > wrote: > > > For instance, to test the cruel BAT files which we are going to deliver. > > You can run .bat files from bash and other Cygwin shells. You can *run* them, but the effect is not always the same. For example, setting an environment variable within a batch file under CMD.EXE results in the environment variable being visible in the calling environment (similar to "sourcing" a file in bash), while calling the batch file from bash leaves the environment intact. Also, some internal commands (for example COPY) are not present in bash, though this can be easily remedied using an alias or a shell function. Other problems are related to the use of \ as a path separator. Imagine that some of your BATCH files generate environment variables containing a Windows path, and simply because bash command lines are interpreted differently than Windows CMD command line (for example, when it comes to quoting or parameter substitution). The main problem, however, is: If you are going to deliver something, which is supposed to run under CMD.EXE, most customers won't accept it until you really have tested it under CMD.EXE, and for good reason. In fact, even though I got running rxvt with cmd thanks to all the suggestions to my post, I will do some *final* tests still in plain, native Windoze Command-Windows, just for the safe side. Using a bash shell as a "main work horse" is great, but when you have the pleasure to create and test batch files, you will sooner or later be happy to also have a CMD shell available... > In both cases you generally to present Windows paths, of course; > cygpath can help with that. I use cygpath in several of my scripts and it's extremely useful, but dealing with the various path representations in interactive work is, for me at least, an annoyance... Thank you for your suggestions, though! Ronald -- Ronald Fischer <ronaldf@eml.cc> + If a packet hits a pocket on a socket on a port, + and the bus is interrupted and the interrupt's not caught, + then the socket packet pocket has an error to report. + (cited after Peter van der Linden) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd 2011-08-25 7:51 ` Ronald Fischer @ 2011-08-25 17:46 ` Andrew DeFaria 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Andrew DeFaria @ 2011-08-25 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On 8/25/2011 12:51 AM, Ronald Fischer wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:56 -0400, "Eliot Moss"<moss@cs.umass.edu> wrote: >> On 8/24/2011 11:52 AM, Ronald of Steiermark wrote: >>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:39 -0700, "Andrew DeFaria"<Andrew@DeFaria.com> >>> wrote: >>> For instance, to test the cruel BAT files which we are going to deliver. >> You can run .bat files from bash and other Cygwin shells. > You can *run* them, but the effect is not always the same. > > For example, setting an environment variable within a batch file under > CMD.EXE results in the environment variable being visible in the calling > environment (similar to "sourcing" a file in bash), while calling the > batch file from bash leaves the environment intact. This behavior is well known. However why does it matter? Are you saying that you have to "source" a .bat file to set up the environment and then execute another .bat file that requires those environment settings??? I'm not saying this doesn't happen but it's not a very good practice. > Also, some internal commands (for example COPY) are not present in bash, > though this can be easily remedied using an alias or a shell function. Why should this be an issue? I mean if you exec some .bat file and it calls "copy" does it not work? > Other problems are related to the use of \ as a path separator. Imagine > that some of your BATCH files generate environment variables containing > a Windows path, Again, why is this a problem? If your .bat file has "copy C:\Windows\some.dll C:\Temp" does it not work? Or are you saying that you may need to do from bash: $ some.bat <Windows path> If this is there are a lot of solutions including cygpath, doubling backslashes, quoting file names or just using forward slashes (which Windows often works just fine with). > and simply because bash command lines are interpreted differently than > Windows CMD command line (for example, when it comes to quoting or > parameter substitution). We all know that bash interprets things the bash way. And no doubt cmd interprets things it's way. I do not see cmd's interpretation as superior. > The main problem, however, is: If you are going to deliver something, > which is supposed to run under CMD.EXE, most customers won't accept it > until you really have tested it under CMD.EXE, and for good reason. That's where: $ cmd /c somescript.bat comes in. That does run it under cmd.exe doesn't it? Why do you need anything more? Why do you need to enter multiple commands and have command history? Why not simply: $ cmd /c testscript1.bat <verify output> $ # That worked! $ cmd /c testscript2.bat <verify output> $ # That worked too... $ # etc... > In fact, even though I got running rxvt with cmd thanks to all the > suggestions to my post, I will do some *final* tests still in plain, > native Windoze Command-Windows, just for the safe side. > > Using a bash shell as a "main work horse" is great, but when you have > the pleasure to create and test batch files, you will sooner or later be > happy to also have a CMD shell available... Just re-write your .bat scripts in Perl! ;-) > >> In both cases you generally to present Windows paths, of course; >> cygpath can help with that. > I use cygpath in several of my scripts and it's extremely useful, but > dealing with the various path representations in interactive work is, > for me at least, an annoyance... It's really not that hard. Just s/\\/\/g! That often is enough. Or do a cygpath -w <posix path> or whatever. -- Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com> My wife keeps complaining I never listen to her ...or something like that. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd 2011-08-24 15:52 ` Ronald of Steiermark 2011-08-24 15:56 ` Eliot Moss @ 2011-08-24 16:04 ` Andrew DeFaria 2011-08-25 7:54 ` Ronald of Steiermark 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Andrew DeFaria @ 2011-08-24 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On 08/24/11 08:52, Ronald of Steiermark wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:39 -0700, "Andrew DeFaria"<Andrew@DeFaria.com> > wrote: >>> I would like to run cmd.exe within a rxvt terminal on Windows 7. >> My question is why? Why do you want to run cmd.exe? > For instance, to test the cruel BAT files which we are going to deliver. How 'bout: $ cmd /c cruel.bat ? Would you really need more? I don't know. I stay way from .bat files... > >> I also find the cmd shell and command language inferior > Language? I wouldn't even call this crap a "language"... I was being kind. > >> in that there's >> nothing special or even convenient in cmd that can't be done even >> quicker and better in bash. > Yep, though right now I'm fancying zsh. Where it makes sense, it's always good to go with what a lot of people go with. How many Solaris machines have zsh installed? > > But we are all slaves to those who pay us... I pay myself! I'm incorporated and I employ myself. I hate being my own slave but it does have it's advantages. The "boss", however, can be a real a-hole if you know what I mean! ;-) > >> That said, and if you're hellbent on using cmd.exe, I >> vaguely recall another terminal emulator program (not a Cygwin thing >> mind you) called, I believe just "Terminal" (Good luck googling that!) >> which (insert fuzzy memory here) I believe used a hidden cmd console >> window to allow the Windows program the proper console environment while >> translating that to the non-hidden Terminal window. That might work... > Thanks a lot, will look it up. > > Ronald -- Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com> The big difference between sex for money and sex for free Is that sex for money usually costs a lot less! -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd 2011-08-24 16:04 ` Andrew DeFaria @ 2011-08-25 7:54 ` Ronald of Steiermark 2011-08-25 17:37 ` Andrew DeFaria 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Ronald of Steiermark @ 2011-08-25 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew DeFaria, cygwin On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:03 -0700, "Andrew DeFaria" <Andrew@DeFaria.com> wrote: > On 08/24/11 08:52, Ronald of Steiermark wrote: > > Yep, though right now I'm fancying zsh. > Where it makes sense, it's always good to go with what a lot of people > go with. How many Solaris machines have zsh installed? All of them I've seen so far ;-) Of course I am aware that there are also plenty Solaris hosts out there where the admin hasn't bother to install it. Ronald -- Ronald Fischer <austria_rules@yepmail.net> There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd 2011-08-25 7:54 ` Ronald of Steiermark @ 2011-08-25 17:37 ` Andrew DeFaria 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Andrew DeFaria @ 2011-08-25 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On 8/25/2011 12:53 AM, Ronald of Steiermark wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:03 -0700, "Andrew DeFaria"<Andrew@DeFaria.com> > wrote: >> On 08/24/11 08:52, Ronald of Steiermark wrote: >>> Yep, though right now I'm fancying zsh. >> Where it makes sense, it's always good to go with what a lot of people >> go with. How many Solaris machines have zsh installed? > All of them I've seen so far ;-) > > Of course I am aware that there are also plenty Solaris hosts out there > where the admin hasn't bother to install it. The question is whether or not it is installed by default. Many shops only install defaults. Often getting something non-default is like pulling teeth. -- Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com> Why is bra singular and panties plural? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-25 17:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-08-24 15:07 Does not work well: rlwrap + rxvt + cmd Ronald Fischer 2011-08-24 15:15 ` Eliot Moss 2011-08-25 7:34 ` Ronald Fischer 2011-08-24 15:16 ` Charles Wilson 2011-08-24 15:40 ` Andrew DeFaria 2011-08-24 15:52 ` Ronald of Steiermark 2011-08-24 15:56 ` Eliot Moss 2011-08-25 7:51 ` Ronald Fischer 2011-08-25 17:46 ` Andrew DeFaria 2011-08-24 16:04 ` Andrew DeFaria 2011-08-25 7:54 ` Ronald of Steiermark 2011-08-25 17:37 ` Andrew DeFaria
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).