* ntsec and sshd question
@ 2001-04-24 16:22 Karl M
2001-04-24 23:37 ` Corinna Vinschen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Karl M @ 2001-04-24 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
Hi All...
I just turned on 'CYGWIN=ntsec tty' and set up my file protections to make
sshd happy (running as a srvany service on win2k sp1).
myname@MACHINENAME ~
$ ps -aef
UID PID PPID TTY STIME COMMAND
system 652 1 0 15:39:34 /usr/sbin/sshd
system 800 1 -1 15:39:39 /usr/sbin/sshd
myname 1272 1 1 15:41:23 /usr/bin/bash
myname 1104 1272 1 15:41:30 /usr/bin/ps
When I rebooted my machine and did a ps, I saw an extra sshd process that I
did not see before. ssh/sshd appear to work fine. Why is there an extra sshd
process...is it normal...does anyone else have the same thing happen?
Thanks,
...Karl
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ntsec and sshd question
2001-04-24 16:22 ntsec and sshd question Karl M
@ 2001-04-24 23:37 ` Corinna Vinschen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Corinna Vinschen @ 2001-04-24 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 04:22:03PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
> Hi All...
>
> I just turned on 'CYGWIN=ntsec tty' and set up my file protections to make
> sshd happy (running as a srvany service on win2k sp1).
>
> myname@MACHINENAME ~
> $ ps -aef
> UID PID PPID TTY STIME COMMAND
> system 652 1 0 15:39:34 /usr/sbin/sshd
> system 800 1 -1 15:39:39 /usr/sbin/sshd
> myname 1272 1 1 15:41:23 /usr/bin/bash
> myname 1104 1272 1 15:41:30 /usr/bin/ps
>
> When I rebooted my machine and did a ps, I saw an extra sshd process that I
> did not see before. ssh/sshd appear to work fine. Why is there an extra sshd
> process...is it normal...does anyone else have the same thing happen?
It's normal. It's the parent sshd which has been started by
SRVANY and which has forked the daemon. It's not needed
anymore but for some reason SRVANY blocks that the process
can exit. if you stop the service (`net stop sshd') you
will see that SRVANY and the first sshd process have exited
but the daemon itself remains and is fully funtional.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ntsec and sshd question
@ 2001-04-25 7:52 Karl M
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Karl M @ 2001-04-25 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
Hi Corinna...
I changed the CYGWIN setting and rebooted a couple of times to see...
With 'CYGWIN=ntsec tty' there is an extra process visible (ps -aef).
With 'CYGWIN=ntsec' there is no extra process visible.
I understand the spawning to authenticate eash login, but why does sshd
spawn an extra time?
If it did not spawn an extra time, stopping the srvany service would do the
right thing, ie stopping the sshd daemon.
In the *nix world, you want to run detached, but as a winnt/win2k service,
you do not.
Thanks,
...Karl
>From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin@cygwin.com>
>To: cygwin@cygwin.com
>Subject: Re: ntsec and sshd question
>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:19:20 +0200
>
>On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:47:00PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
> > Hi Corinna...
> >
> > But I did not see it before I set 'CYGWIN=ntsec tty'. When I had no
>value
> > set for the CYGWIN variable, I did not see the extra sshd process. Why
>is it
> > different now?
>
>Dunno. Could you try "CYGWIN=nontsec tty" and "CYGWIN=ntsec notty"
>to check which setting raises that behaviour?
>
>Corinna
>
>--
>Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
>Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
>Red Hat, Inc.
>
>--
>Want to unsubscribe from this list?
>Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ntsec and sshd question
2001-04-24 23:47 Karl M
@ 2001-04-25 0:19 ` Corinna Vinschen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Corinna Vinschen @ 2001-04-25 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 11:47:00PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
> Hi Corinna...
>
> But I did not see it before I set 'CYGWIN=ntsec tty'. When I had no value
> set for the CYGWIN variable, I did not see the extra sshd process. Why is it
> different now?
Dunno. Could you try "CYGWIN=nontsec tty" and "CYGWIN=ntsec notty"
to check which setting raises that behaviour?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ntsec and sshd question
@ 2001-04-24 23:47 Karl M
2001-04-25 0:19 ` Corinna Vinschen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Karl M @ 2001-04-24 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
Hi Corinna...
But I did not see it before I set 'CYGWIN=ntsec tty'. When I had no value
set for the CYGWIN variable, I did not see the extra sshd process. Why is it
different now?
Thanks,
...Karl
>From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin@cygwin.com>
>To: cygwin@cygwin.com
>Subject: Re: ntsec and sshd question
>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:37:48 +0200
>
>On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 04:22:03PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
> > Hi All...
> >
> > I just turned on 'CYGWIN=ntsec tty' and set up my file protections to
>make
> > sshd happy (running as a srvany service on win2k sp1).
> >
> > myname@MACHINENAME ~
> > $ ps -aef
> > UID PID PPID TTY STIME COMMAND
> > system 652 1 0 15:39:34 /usr/sbin/sshd
> > system 800 1 -1 15:39:39 /usr/sbin/sshd
> > myname 1272 1 1 15:41:23 /usr/bin/bash
> > myname 1104 1272 1 15:41:30 /usr/bin/ps
> >
> > When I rebooted my machine and did a ps, I saw an extra sshd process
>that I
> > did not see before. ssh/sshd appear to work fine. Why is there an extra
>sshd
> > process...is it normal...does anyone else have the same thing happen?
>
>It's normal. It's the parent sshd which has been started by
>SRVANY and which has forked the daemon. It's not needed
>anymore but for some reason SRVANY blocks that the process
>can exit. if you stop the service (`net stop sshd') you
>will see that SRVANY and the first sshd process have exited
>but the daemon itself remains and is fully funtional.
>
>Corinna
>
>--
>Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
>Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
>Red Hat, Inc.
>
>--
>Want to unsubscribe from this list?
>Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-04-25 7:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-04-24 16:22 ntsec and sshd question Karl M
2001-04-24 23:37 ` Corinna Vinschen
2001-04-24 23:47 Karl M
2001-04-25 0:19 ` Corinna Vinschen
2001-04-25 7:52 Karl M
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).