public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* GCC release criteria
@ 2019-08-18 15:18 Denis Excoffier
  2019-08-19  8:40 ` Brian Inglis
  2019-08-19  9:46 ` Corinna Vinschen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Denis Excoffier @ 2019-08-18 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin; +Cc: Denis Excoffier

Hello,

In the GCC 10 Release Criteria, one can read (https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/criteria.html) that cygwin is among the secondary platform list:

> 
> Secondary Platform List
>
> The secondary platforms are:
> * aarch64-elf
> * i686-apple-darwin
> * i686-pc-cygwin
> * i686-mingw32
> * powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0
> * s390x-linux-gnu
>

This is ok of course, but nowadays, perhaps would it be a better choice
that they switch to x86_64-pc-cygwin? What do you think?

Regards,

Denis Excoffier.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: GCC release criteria
  2019-08-18 15:18 GCC release criteria Denis Excoffier
@ 2019-08-19  8:40 ` Brian Inglis
  2019-08-19  9:46 ` Corinna Vinschen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brian Inglis @ 2019-08-19  8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

On 2019-08-18 08:51, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> In the GCC 10 Release Criteria, one can read 
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/criteria.html) that cygwin is among the
> secondary platform list:

>> Secondary Platform List
>>
>> The secondary platforms are:
>> * aarch64-elf
>> * i686-apple-darwin
>> * i686-pc-cygwin
>> * i686-mingw32
>> * powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0
>> * s390x-linux-gnu

> This is ok of course, but nowadays, perhaps would it be a better choice
> that they switch to x86_64-pc-cygwin? What do you think?

Also mingw64-x86_64, and doubt there is an i686-apple-darwin, more likely
x86_64-/amd64-apple-darwin.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: GCC release criteria
  2019-08-18 15:18 GCC release criteria Denis Excoffier
  2019-08-19  8:40 ` Brian Inglis
@ 2019-08-19  9:46 ` Corinna Vinschen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Corinna Vinschen @ 2019-08-19  9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 697 bytes --]

On Aug 18 16:51, Denis Excoffier wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> In the GCC 10 Release Criteria, one can read (https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/criteria.html) that cygwin is among the secondary platform list:
> 
> > 
> > Secondary Platform List
> >
> > The secondary platforms are:
> > * aarch64-elf
> > * i686-apple-darwin
> > * i686-pc-cygwin
> > * i686-mingw32
> > * powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0
> > * s390x-linux-gnu
> >
> 
> This is ok of course, but nowadays, perhaps would it be a better choice
> that they switch to x86_64-pc-cygwin? What do you think?

Sounds right.  I don't know how the secondary target choices are made,
though.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-19  8:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-18 15:18 GCC release criteria Denis Excoffier
2019-08-19  8:40 ` Brian Inglis
2019-08-19  9:46 ` Corinna Vinschen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).