* Is the Mercurial package still maintained? @ 2019-07-18 18:10 Ti Strga 2019-07-18 18:48 ` Ken Brown 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Ti Strga @ 2019-07-18 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin Hi. Upstream is at v5.0.2. The cygwin repo has been at 4.3.2 for almost two years now, missing not only a lot of features but also the security fixes in 4.7.2 and 4.9. Is a new package blocked waiting on other support to be completed? Or is it simply orphaned and waiting for a new maintainer or NMU? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is the Mercurial package still maintained? 2019-07-18 18:10 Is the Mercurial package still maintained? Ti Strga @ 2019-07-18 18:48 ` Ken Brown 2019-07-30 7:44 ` Jari Aalto 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Ken Brown @ 2019-07-18 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin; +Cc: Jari Aalto [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 703 bytes --] On 7/18/2019 2:10 PM, Ti Strga wrote: > Hi. > > Upstream is at v5.0.2. The cygwin repo has been at 4.3.2 for almost two > years now, missing not only a lot of features but also the security fixes > in 4.7.2 and 4.9. > > Is a new package blocked waiting on other support to be completed? Or is > it simply orphaned and waiting for a new maintainer or NMU? The maintainer is Jari Aalto. I don't know if he reads the list, so I'm adding him to the CC. Ken \0ТÒÐÐ¥\a&ö&ÆVÒ\a&W\x06÷'G3¢\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x06GG\x03¢òö7wvâæ6öÒ÷\a&ö&ÆV×2æFÖÀФd\x15\x13¢\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x06GG\x03¢òö7wvâæ6öÒöf\x17\x12ðФFö7VÖVçF\x17Föã¢\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x06GG\x03¢òö7wvâæ6öÒöFö72æFÖÀÐ¥Vç7V'67&&R\x06æfó¢\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x06GG\x03¢òö7wvâæ6öÒöÖÂò7Vç7V'67&&R×6×\x06ÆPÐ Ð ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is the Mercurial package still maintained? 2019-07-18 18:48 ` Ken Brown @ 2019-07-30 7:44 ` Jari Aalto 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Jari Aalto @ 2019-07-30 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ken Brown; +Cc: cygwin On 2019-07-18 18:47, Ken Brown wrote: > On 7/18/2019 2:10 PM, Ti Strga wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Upstream is at v5.0.2. The cygwin repo has been at 4.3.2 for almost two > > years now, missing not only a lot of features but also the security fixes > > in 4.7.2 and 4.9. > > > > Is a new package blocked waiting on other support to be completed? Or is > > it simply orphaned and waiting for a new maintainer or NMU? > > The maintainer is Jari Aalto. I don't know if he reads the list, so I'm adding > him to the CC. I'll update it, Jari -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-30 7:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-07-18 18:10 Is the Mercurial package still maintained? Ti Strga 2019-07-18 18:48 ` Ken Brown 2019-07-30 7:44 ` Jari Aalto
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).