* Is the Mercurial package still maintained?
@ 2019-07-18 18:10 Ti Strga
2019-07-18 18:48 ` Ken Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ti Strga @ 2019-07-18 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
Hi.
Upstream is at v5.0.2. The cygwin repo has been at 4.3.2 for almost two
years now, missing not only a lot of features but also the security fixes
in 4.7.2 and 4.9.
Is a new package blocked waiting on other support to be completed? Or is
it simply orphaned and waiting for a new maintainer or NMU?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is the Mercurial package still maintained?
2019-07-18 18:10 Is the Mercurial package still maintained? Ti Strga
@ 2019-07-18 18:48 ` Ken Brown
2019-07-30 7:44 ` Jari Aalto
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ken Brown @ 2019-07-18 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin; +Cc: Jari Aalto
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 703 bytes --]
On 7/18/2019 2:10 PM, Ti Strga wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Upstream is at v5.0.2. The cygwin repo has been at 4.3.2 for almost two
> years now, missing not only a lot of features but also the security fixes
> in 4.7.2 and 4.9.
>
> Is a new package blocked waiting on other support to be completed? Or is
> it simply orphaned and waiting for a new maintainer or NMU?
The maintainer is Jari Aalto. I don't know if he reads the list, so I'm adding
him to the CC.
Ken
\0ТÒÐÐ¥\a&ö&ÆVÒ\a&W\x06÷'G3¢\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x06GG\x03¢òö7wvâæ6öÒ÷\a&ö&ÆV×2æFÖÀФd\x15\x13¢\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x06GG\x03¢òö7wvâæ6öÒöf\x17\x12ðФFö7VÖVçF\x17Föã¢\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x06GG\x03¢òö7wvâæ6öÒöFö72æFÖÀÐ¥Vç7V'67&&R\x06æfó¢\x02\x02\x02\x02\x02\x06GG\x03¢òö7wvâæ6öÒöÖÂò7Vç7V'67&&R×6×\x06ÆPÐ Ð
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is the Mercurial package still maintained?
2019-07-18 18:48 ` Ken Brown
@ 2019-07-30 7:44 ` Jari Aalto
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jari Aalto @ 2019-07-30 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ken Brown; +Cc: cygwin
On 2019-07-18 18:47, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 7/18/2019 2:10 PM, Ti Strga wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Upstream is at v5.0.2. The cygwin repo has been at 4.3.2 for almost two
> > years now, missing not only a lot of features but also the security fixes
> > in 4.7.2 and 4.9.
> >
> > Is a new package blocked waiting on other support to be completed? Or is
> > it simply orphaned and waiting for a new maintainer or NMU?
>
> The maintainer is Jari Aalto. I don't know if he reads the list, so I'm adding
> him to the CC.
I'll update it,
Jari
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-30 7:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-18 18:10 Is the Mercurial package still maintained? Ti Strga
2019-07-18 18:48 ` Ken Brown
2019-07-30 7:44 ` Jari Aalto
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).