public inbox for docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc@cu-portland.edu>
To: Craig Boone <craig@estinc.com>
Cc: Alan "W. Irwin" <irwin@beluga.phys.uvic.ca>,
	docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Where, what and how - The future of DocBook
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c11299936186bfab0a3d84cd0aae09a@NO-ID-FOUND.mhonarc.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A2E8FCB.51D92BD2@estinc.com>

> Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> 
> > I've gotten around this the easy way, I don't use pdfjadetex.  Instead,
> > I use a tool called htmldoc, which convers from HTML to PS/PDF, and does
> > a VERY nice job at it.  The only thing that's missing is that it doesn't
> > convert the external (href) hyperlinks to something useful along the
> > way.  I can do this with jade, but jade is slow.
> > 
> >     Greg
> 
> Is htmldoc something that you created, or is it something that's
> available for download?  I can't seem to get any of the pdf/ps


I guess this is what I get for not posting a
URL.  :-)  http://www.easysw.com/htmldoc/  htmldoc is GPL, so use it how
you like.


> conversions to occur properly with the DocBook tools that I have.  I'm
> using the db2pdf and db2ps scripts and all they seem to do is explode
> and spew latex errors everywhere.  I can write picture-perfect sgml and
> it makes lovely html conversions, but it doesn't do me much good if I
> can't get it printed. 


We use just straight Jade, as the db2 scripts weren't very portable, and
because we NEED good PS/PDF output.  The only thing that we're still
working on is good text support.


> I've been monitoring this list and watching all of the "Future of
> DocBook" threads and I gotta say it's a great project and I'd love to be
> able to set it as a standard to create all of my documentation. 
> However, I just can't seem to get a dependable set of tools and solidly
> implement them.  Suggestions?


Take a look at the LDP Authors Guide
http://www.LinuxDoc.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/
It's got a great deal of information on what the LDP is using.  I'm
actually working on a jade wrapper using make rather than the stuff that
the docbook tools project has done, as this is exactly what make is
designed for.  I hope to have something worth showing off early next
year.

    Greg

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc@cu-portland.edu>
To: Craig Boone <craig@estinc.com>
Cc: Alan "W. Irwin" <irwin@beluga.phys.uvic.ca>,
	docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Where, what and how - The future of DocBook
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 11:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c11299936186bfab0a3d84cd0aae09a@NO-ID-FOUND.mhonarc.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20001206111200.UGCqOPiYSG5KCVVDznH9TCL3bB2SWdmXZr8hnXBUg14@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A2E8FCB.51D92BD2@estinc.com>

> Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> 
> > I've gotten around this the easy way, I don't use pdfjadetex.  Instead,
> > I use a tool called htmldoc, which convers from HTML to PS/PDF, and does
> > a VERY nice job at it.  The only thing that's missing is that it doesn't
> > convert the external (href) hyperlinks to something useful along the
> > way.  I can do this with jade, but jade is slow.
> > 
> >     Greg
> 
> Is htmldoc something that you created, or is it something that's
> available for download?  I can't seem to get any of the pdf/ps


I guess this is what I get for not posting a
URL.  :-)  http://www.easysw.com/htmldoc/  htmldoc is GPL, so use it how
you like.


> conversions to occur properly with the DocBook tools that I have.  I'm
> using the db2pdf and db2ps scripts and all they seem to do is explode
> and spew latex errors everywhere.  I can write picture-perfect sgml and
> it makes lovely html conversions, but it doesn't do me much good if I
> can't get it printed. 


We use just straight Jade, as the db2 scripts weren't very portable, and
because we NEED good PS/PDF output.  The only thing that we're still
working on is good text support.


> I've been monitoring this list and watching all of the "Future of
> DocBook" threads and I gotta say it's a great project and I'd love to be
> able to set it as a standard to create all of my documentation. 
> However, I just can't seem to get a dependable set of tools and solidly
> implement them.  Suggestions?


Take a look at the LDP Authors Guide
http://www.LinuxDoc.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/
It's got a great deal of information on what the LDP is using.  I'm
actually working on a jade wrapper using make rather than the stuff that
the docbook tools project has done, as this is exactly what make is
designed for.  I hope to have something worth showing off early next
year.

    Greg

  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-12-27  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200012061723.KAA06519@gw.estinc.com>
2000-12-27  6:36 ` Craig Boone
2000-12-06 11:06   ` Craig Boone
     [not found]   ` <200012061858.LAA06946@gw.estinc.com>
2000-12-27  6:36     ` Craig Boone
2000-12-06 11:46       ` Craig Boone
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Gregory Leblanc [this message]
2000-12-06 11:12     ` Gregory Leblanc
2000-12-27  6:36 Peter Ring
2000-12-07  3:45 ` Peter Ring
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-27  6:36 Peter Ring
2000-12-05  7:45 ` Peter Ring
2000-12-27  6:36 Pfaffner, Peter
2000-12-05  7:18 ` Pfaffner, Peter
     [not found] <200012061914.UAA08546@mailserv.caiw.nl>
2000-12-27  6:36 ` Hugo.van.der.Kooij
2000-12-06 12:31   ` Hugo.van.der.Kooij
2000-12-27  6:36 Peter Toft
2000-12-03  9:23 ` Peter Toft
2000-12-27  6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-04  6:08   ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Peter Toft
2000-12-05 14:12     ` Peter Toft
2000-12-27  6:36     ` Alan W. Irwin
2000-12-05 15:53       ` Alan W. Irwin
2000-12-27  6:36       ` Michael Smith
2000-12-05 21:27         ` Michael Smith
2000-12-27  6:36         ` Alan W. Irwin
2000-12-05 22:50           ` Alan W. Irwin
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Gregory Leblanc
2000-12-06  9:39             ` Gregory Leblanc
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Michael Smith
2000-12-06  0:51             ` Michael Smith
2000-12-27  6:36         ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-06  5:23           ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36     ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-05 16:58       ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36       ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-06  5:10         ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36         ` Michael Wiedmann
2000-12-06  5:36           ` Michael Wiedmann
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-06  5:53             ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Mark Johnson
2000-12-06  8:05               ` Mark Johnson
2000-12-27  6:36               ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-06  8:15                 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36         ` madhu
2000-12-15  9:22           ` madhu
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Michael Smith
2000-12-15 10:40             ` Michael Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5c11299936186bfab0a3d84cd0aae09a@NO-ID-FOUND.mhonarc.org \
    --to=gleblanc@cu-portland.edu \
    --cc=craig@estinc.com \
    --cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=irwin@beluga.phys.uvic.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).