From: Peter Toft <pto@sslug.dk>
To: <docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: Where, what and how - The future of DocBook
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012031814190.1638-100000@pto.sslug> (raw)
Dudez - this is not to start a flamewar, so be positive
and think constructive now:
Many people agree that DocBook is the path to continue
along for Open Source program documentation and perhaps
also the system we should promote to use for document
handling in general.
Fine - which tools are available for writing
SGML/DocBook on Linux+xBSD or Windows?
- Emacs and alike tools?
- Any WYSIWYG editors?
- Any *fast* syntax verification system
- and what is being made in general
At the moment I write a lot in Emacs - but my mum would
not try that!!!
Many companies don't accept DocBook - why?
Can't we do better???
What is the future for SGML/DocBook versus XML/DocBook
- again also regarding tools, the work efford going on
at the moment etc.
Best regards
Peter/A DocBook user for several years now.
--
Peter Toft, Ph.D. [pto@sslug.dk] http://www.sslug.dk/~pto
"You don't win a battle by asking, `Will we win?'
You win it by doing your best to win" - Richard M Stallman
LinuxKonference i København: http://LinuxForum.dk/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Peter Toft <pto@sslug.dk>
To: <docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: Where, what and how - The future of DocBook
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 09:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012031814190.1638-100000@pto.sslug> (raw)
Message-ID: <20001203092300.Hu1atEPg_iVuIfwJVFC5o-QXBYB3OOM5QxVY3z-N208@z> (raw)
Dudez - this is not to start a flamewar, so be positive
and think constructive now:
Many people agree that DocBook is the path to continue
along for Open Source program documentation and perhaps
also the system we should promote to use for document
handling in general.
Fine - which tools are available for writing
SGML/DocBook on Linux+xBSD or Windows?
- Emacs and alike tools?
- Any WYSIWYG editors?
- Any *fast* syntax verification system
- and what is being made in general
At the moment I write a lot in Emacs - but my mum would
not try that!!!
Many companies don't accept DocBook - why?
Can't we do better???
What is the future for SGML/DocBook versus XML/DocBook
- again also regarding tools, the work efford going on
at the moment etc.
Best regards
Peter/A DocBook user for several years now.
--
Peter Toft, Ph.D. [pto@sslug.dk] http://www.sslug.dk/~pto
"You don't win a battle by asking, `Will we win?'
You win it by doing your best to win" - Richard M Stallman
LinuxKonference i København: http://LinuxForum.dk/
next reply other threads:[~2000-12-27 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-27 6:36 Peter Toft [this message]
2000-12-03 9:23 ` Peter Toft
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-04 6:08 ` Norman Walsh
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Peter Toft
2000-12-05 14:12 ` Peter Toft
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-05 16:58 ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-06 5:10 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Michael Wiedmann
2000-12-06 5:36 ` Michael Wiedmann
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-06 5:53 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Mark Johnson
2000-12-06 8:05 ` Mark Johnson
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-06 8:15 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` madhu
2000-12-15 9:22 ` madhu
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Michael Smith
2000-12-15 10:40 ` Michael Smith
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Alan W. Irwin
2000-12-05 15:53 ` Alan W. Irwin
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Michael Smith
2000-12-05 21:27 ` Michael Smith
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-06 5:23 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Alan W. Irwin
2000-12-05 22:50 ` Alan W. Irwin
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Gregory Leblanc
2000-12-06 9:39 ` Gregory Leblanc
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Michael Smith
2000-12-06 0:51 ` Michael Smith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-27 6:36 Peter Ring
2000-12-05 7:45 ` Peter Ring
2000-12-27 6:36 Pfaffner, Peter
2000-12-05 7:18 ` Pfaffner, Peter
2000-12-27 6:36 Peter Ring
2000-12-07 3:45 ` Peter Ring
[not found] <200012061723.KAA06519@gw.estinc.com>
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Craig Boone
2000-12-06 11:06 ` Craig Boone
[not found] ` <200012061858.LAA06946@gw.estinc.com>
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Craig Boone
2000-12-06 11:46 ` Craig Boone
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Gregory Leblanc
2000-12-06 11:12 ` Gregory Leblanc
[not found] <200012061914.UAA08546@mailserv.caiw.nl>
2000-12-27 6:36 ` Hugo.van.der.Kooij
2000-12-06 12:31 ` Hugo.van.der.Kooij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.30.0012031814190.1638-100000@pto.sslug \
--to=pto@sslug.dk \
--cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).