From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>, dwz@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: dwz 0.14 release?
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:15:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59176fae-d720-5a9c-e69c-2553706b7ff1@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b6633862f257bac99fa3fccfde18b931ad10cf2.camel@klomp.org>
On 2/10/21 1:06 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what we still need to do to get a 0.14 release out?
> It would be nice to release now that we support DWARF5 as GCC11 outputs
> it by default now. There are some DWARF5 constructs we still don't
> support, but they aren't really required because they are non-default.
>
> The only real issue is the combination of DWARF5 and dwz --odr. We see
> the following failures in the testsuite:
>
> There are still failures with the ODR support when building the
> testcases with -gdwarf-5, specifically:
>
> FAIL: /opt/local/src/dwz/testsuite/dwz.tests/odr-class-ns.sh
> FAIL: /opt/local/src/dwz/testsuite/dwz.tests/odr-def-decl.sh
> FAIL: /opt/local/src/dwz/testsuite/dwz.tests/odr-loc.sh
> FAIL: /opt/local/src/dwz/testsuite/dwz.tests/odr-struct.sh
> FAIL: /opt/local/src/dwz/testsuite/dwz.tests/odr-struct-ns.sh
> FAIL: /opt/local/src/dwz/testsuite/dwz.tests/odr-union.sh
> FAIL: /opt/local/src/dwz/testsuite/dwz.tests/odr-class.sh
> FAIL: /opt/local/src/dwz/testsuite/dwz.tests/odr-union-ns.sh
>
> I haven't really investigated why that is. But we can always say
> that ODR support is experimental and doesn't yet work for DWARF5.
I can't reproduce this, can you open an PR with more details?
Anyway, odr will be experimental. It still need to marked as such.
Furthermore, I still need to go through the PR list and clean up.
Thanks,
- Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-11 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-10 12:06 Mark Wielaard
2021-02-11 9:15 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2021-02-12 10:08 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-02-19 1:16 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-02-26 23:37 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-03-01 10:49 ` tdevries
2021-03-01 11:17 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-03-01 12:40 ` Tom de Vries
2021-03-05 7:26 ` Tom de Vries
2021-03-05 16:24 ` Tom de Vries
2021-03-08 7:14 ` Tom de Vries
2021-03-08 7:22 ` Mark Wielaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59176fae-d720-5a9c-e69c-2553706b7ff1@suse.de \
--to=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=dwz@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark@klomp.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).