From: "Jürgen Lambrecht" <J.Lambrecht@televic.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: "john@dallaway.org.uk" <john@dallaway.org.uk>,
"ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org"
<ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org>,
Deroo Stijn <S.Deroo@TELEVIC.com>
Subject: Re: Re: NAND review
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A267B93.3040401@televic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090603085115.GA27508@lunn.ch>
Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:17:58 +0100
>> From: John Dallaway <john@dallaway.org.uk>
>> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch>
>> CC: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@ecos.sourceware.org>
>> Subject: Re: NAND & YAFFS
>>
>> Have you been able to form a view on the relative merits of the VU
>> Amsterdam and eCosCentric implementations so far? Just wanting to ensure
>> that this process is not stalled for any reason...
>>
>> John Dallaway
>>
>
>
<snip>
> There was an email from Rutger that Televic are willing to contribute
> their drivers for an AT91SAM9260 based board. If that happens, it
> would mean two real implementations for Rutgers, vs one for Ross.
>
>
Indeed, we would like to contribute, but it takes time...
Stijn will try to do the contribution, I will get the FSF copyright
assignment (but the site is down today..).
Kind regards,
Jürgen
<snip>
> Andrew
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-03 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-19 8:27 Simon Kallweit
2009-05-19 13:47 ` Ross Younger
2009-05-19 14:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-05-20 13:24 ` Bart Veer
2009-05-20 13:34 ` Rutger Hofman
2009-05-20 13:53 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-05-20 13:56 ` Gary Thomas
2009-05-20 14:22 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-05-20 15:22 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-05-20 15:34 ` Bart Veer
2009-05-20 13:58 ` Rutger Hofman
2009-05-20 14:16 ` Ross Younger
2009-05-20 14:21 ` Gary Thomas
2009-05-20 15:25 ` Ross Younger
2009-05-20 15:37 ` Gary Thomas
2009-05-19 16:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-06-03 8:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-06-03 10:21 ` Ross Younger
2009-06-03 10:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-06-03 11:52 ` Simon Kallweit
2009-06-03 12:26 ` Rutger Hofman
2009-06-03 13:33 ` Jürgen Lambrecht [this message]
2009-06-10 17:39 ` Nick Garnett
2009-06-11 11:25 ` Rutger Hofman
2009-06-13 16:31 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-06-18 14:10 ` Nick Garnett
2009-06-19 7:47 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-06-19 14:14 ` Ross Younger
2009-06-19 15:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-06-19 16:54 ` Jürgen Lambrecht
2009-06-29 11:09 ` Nick Garnett
2009-06-19 8:07 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-06-19 11:37 ` Daniel Morris
2009-06-19 12:06 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-05-20 1:02 ` Jonathan Larmour
2009-05-20 7:11 ` Simon Kallweit
2009-05-20 11:12 ` Rutger Hofman
2009-05-20 11:29 ` Simon Kallweit
2009-05-20 13:37 ` Rutger Hofman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A267B93.3040401@televic.com \
--to=j.lambrecht@televic.com \
--cc=S.Deroo@TELEVIC.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ecos-devel@ecos.sourceware.org \
--cc=john@dallaway.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).