public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>
To: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour@redhat.com>
Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com, Gary Thomas <gthomas@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ECOS] MS_TICKS() revisited
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 12:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010209141632.B4898@visi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A844D11.4C910A3D@redhat.com>

On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 08:03:29PM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
> > > Thanks for the patch. One query before I apply it:
> > >
> > > +#if !defined(CYGPKG_REDBOOT_NETWORKING)
> > > +#define MS_TICKS_DELAY() hal_delay_us(1000)
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > >
> > > Any reason this isn't do_ms_tick() ?
> > 
> > IIRC, I was thinking at the time that do_ms_tick() was part of
> > the networking package.  It isn't, so it probably should be
> > do_ms_tick().  Now that I think of it, it might be a better
> > idea to move the definitions for MS_TICKS() and
> > MS_TICKS_DELAY() from net.h into a more general spot like
> > redboot.h.  Then we don't need that chunk at all.
> 
> I think that would be fine. If Gary T also agrees (CC'd) could you resubmit
> your patch with that change?

Uh, wait, that piece of pre-processor code is in a file
(net_io.c) that is part of the networking package, so we can
ditch it without moving the definitions out of net.h.

I've no idea why I thought that needed to be there.  :/

-- 
Grant Edwards
grante@visi.com

  reply	other threads:[~2001-02-09 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-09 11:14 Grant Edwards
2001-02-09 11:50 ` Jonathan Larmour
2001-02-09 11:57   ` Grant Edwards
2001-02-09 12:03     ` Jonathan Larmour
2001-02-09 12:12       ` Grant Edwards [this message]
2001-02-09 14:03         ` Jonathan Larmour
2001-02-09 14:04           ` Grant Edwards
2001-02-11 12:18   ` Gary Thomas
2001-02-12  7:30     ` [ECOS] " Grant Edwards
2001-02-12  7:33       ` Gary Thomas
2001-02-12  9:55         ` Jonathan Larmour

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010209141632.B4898@visi.com \
    --to=grante@visi.com \
    --cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=gthomas@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlarmour@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).