* [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ? @ 2001-01-26 20:25 Lee Nipper 2001-01-29 4:36 ` AW: " Joerg Rapka 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Lee Nipper @ 2001-01-26 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ecos-discuss Does anyone know of a 68302 (or even 680x0) port of eCos ? thanks, ln ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* AW: [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ? 2001-01-26 20:25 [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ? Lee Nipper @ 2001-01-29 4:36 ` Joerg Rapka 2001-01-31 6:44 ` [ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell? Peter Graf 2001-07-25 17:58 ` [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ? wangwei 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Joerg Rapka @ 2001-01-29 4:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: leenipper; +Cc: ecos-discuss Hi I have made a port of eCos to my M68331 based hardware. The port is still under development and is not yet contributed to Red Hat. Further interests? - just contact me. Best regards Joerg Rapka -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com [ mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com]Im Auftrag von Lee Nipper Gesendet: Samstag, 27. Januar 2001 05:25 An: ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com Betreff: [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ? Does anyone know of a 68302 (or even 680x0) port of eCos ? thanks, ln ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell? 2001-01-29 4:36 ` AW: " Joerg Rapka @ 2001-01-31 6:44 ` Peter Graf 2001-01-31 9:21 ` Jonathan Larmour 2001-07-25 17:58 ` [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ? wangwei 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Peter Graf @ 2001-01-31 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ecos-discuss Hi, does anybody know what happened to the stdio functions feof & ftell? I can't find something like libc/stdio/current/src/common/feof.cxx. stdio.h has the declarations, but the implementations seem to be missing. Peter ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell? 2001-01-31 6:44 ` [ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell? Peter Graf @ 2001-01-31 9:21 ` Jonathan Larmour 2001-01-31 22:57 ` Martin van Veen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2001-01-31 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Graf; +Cc: ecos-discuss Peter Graf wrote: > > does anybody know what happened to the stdio functions feof & ftell? I > can't find something like libc/stdio/current/src/common/feof.cxx. > > stdio.h has the declarations, but the implementations seem to be missing. Yes this sucks. They used to be implemented, but got obsoleted at one point. I've been meaning to redo them, but have never had the time - I haven't forgotten. Of course, all patches welcome :-). Jifl -- Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062 Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell? 2001-01-31 9:21 ` Jonathan Larmour @ 2001-01-31 22:57 ` Martin van Veen 2001-01-31 23:17 ` Jonathan Larmour 2001-02-01 0:48 ` Peter Graf 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Martin van Veen @ 2001-01-31 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jlarmour, p.graf; +Cc: ecos-discuss Hi guys, like ftell and feof there is more stuff missing (which I wrote some weeks ago, but nobody responded). Fortunately, these functions are implemented, but only not mentioned in the stdio.h file. I patched stdio.h so that fileno and fdopen can be used. Patch is attached... Greetings, Martin. --- Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour@redhat.com> wrote: > Peter Graf wrote: >> >> does anybody know what happened to the stdio functions feof & ftell? >> I can't find something like libc/stdio/current/src/common/feof.cxx. >> stdio.h has the declarations, but the implementations seem to be >> missing. > > Yes this sucks. They used to be implemented, but got obsoleted at one > point. I've been meaning to redo them, but have never had the time - > I haven't forgotten. Of course, all patches welcome :-). __________________________________________________ Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ --- packages/language/c/libc/stdio/current/include/stdio.h Wed Nov 22 13:43:28 2000 +++ packages/language/c/libc/stdio/current/include/stdio.h.patched Thu Feb 1 07:46:13 2001 @@ -125,6 +125,12 @@ freopen( const char * /* filename */, const char * /* mode */, FILE * /* stream */ ); +externC FILE * +fdopen( int /* descriptor */, const char * /* mode */ ); + +externC int +fileno( FILE * /* stream */ ); + externC void setbuf( FILE * /* stream */, char * /* buffer */ ); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell? 2001-01-31 22:57 ` Martin van Veen @ 2001-01-31 23:17 ` Jonathan Larmour 2001-02-01 0:48 ` Peter Graf 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2001-01-31 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin van Veen; +Cc: ecos-discuss Martin van Veen wrote: > > I patched > stdio.h so that fileno and fdopen can be used. Patch is attached... Thanks. I've fixed this now (in a slightly different way). Jifl -- Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062 Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell? 2001-01-31 22:57 ` Martin van Veen 2001-01-31 23:17 ` Jonathan Larmour @ 2001-02-01 0:48 ` Peter Graf 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Peter Graf @ 2001-02-01 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ecos-discuss Martin van Veen wrote: >like ftell and feof there is more stuff missing (which I wrote some >weeks ago, but nobody responded). Fortunately, these functions are >implemented, but only not mentioned in the stdio.h file. I patched >stdio.h so that fileno and fdopen can be used. Patch is attached... Thank you very much. You are right, at least ftell() is available in the latest CVS snapshot. I've been using an older sourcetree. Thanks for the hint. All the best Peter ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ? 2001-01-29 4:36 ` AW: " Joerg Rapka 2001-01-31 6:44 ` [ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell? Peter Graf @ 2001-07-25 17:58 ` wangwei 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: wangwei @ 2001-07-25 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joerg Rapka; +Cc: ecos-discuss Hi,Joerg As you said , your ecos ported to m68 is ok. Now I want to do the same thing . So I want to know if you prepare to contribute this porting to redhat or not . ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joerg Rapka" <joerg.rapka@duagon.com> To: <leenipper@acm.org> Cc: <ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 8:35 PM Subject: AW: [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ? > Hi > > I have made a port of eCos to my M68331 based hardware. > The port is still under development and is not yet contributed > to Red Hat. > > Further interests? - just contact me. > > Best regards > > Joerg Rapka > > > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com > [ mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com]Im Auftrag von Lee Nipper > Gesendet: Samstag, 27. Januar 2001 05:25 > An: ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com > Betreff: [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ? > > > Does anyone know of a 68302 (or even 680x0) port > of eCos ? > > thanks, > ln ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-07-25 17:58 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2001-01-26 20:25 [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ? Lee Nipper 2001-01-29 4:36 ` AW: " Joerg Rapka 2001-01-31 6:44 ` [ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell? Peter Graf 2001-01-31 9:21 ` Jonathan Larmour 2001-01-31 22:57 ` Martin van Veen 2001-01-31 23:17 ` Jonathan Larmour 2001-02-01 0:48 ` Peter Graf 2001-07-25 17:58 ` [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ? wangwei
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).