[ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ?

[ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ?

[Lee Nipper]

Does anyone know of a 68302 (or even 680x0) port
of eCos ?

thanks,
ln

AW: [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ?

[Joerg Rapka]

Hi

I have made a port of eCos to my M68331 based hardware.
The port is still under development and is not yet contributed
to Red Hat.

Further interests? - just contact me.

Best regards

Joerg Rapka


-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
[ mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com]Im Auftrag von Lee Nipper
Gesendet: Samstag, 27. Januar 2001 05:25
An: ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Betreff: [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ?


Does anyone know of a 68302 (or even 680x0) port
of eCos ?

thanks,
ln

[ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell?

[Peter Graf]

Hi,

does anybody know what happened to the stdio functions feof & ftell? I
can't find something like libc/stdio/current/src/common/feof.cxx.

stdio.h has the declarations, but the implementations seem to be missing.

Peter

Re: [ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell?

[Jonathan Larmour]

Peter Graf wrote:
> 
> does anybody know what happened to the stdio functions feof & ftell? I
> can't find something like libc/stdio/current/src/common/feof.cxx.
> 
> stdio.h has the declarations, but the implementations seem to be missing.

Yes this sucks. They used to be implemented, but got obsoleted at one
point. I've been meaning to redo them, but have never had the time - I
haven't forgotten. Of course, all patches welcome :-).

Jifl
-- 
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine

Re: [ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell?

[Martin van Veen]

Hi guys,

like ftell and feof there is more stuff missing (which I wrote some
weeks ago, but nobody responded). Fortunately, these functions are
implemented, but only not mentioned in the stdio.h file. I patched
stdio.h so that fileno and fdopen can be used. Patch is attached...

Greetings,
Martin.

--- Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour@redhat.com> wrote:
> Peter Graf wrote:
>> 
>> does anybody know what happened to the stdio functions feof & ftell?
>> I can't find something like libc/stdio/current/src/common/feof.cxx.
>> stdio.h has the declarations, but the implementations seem to be
>> missing.
> 
> Yes this sucks. They used to be implemented, but got obsoleted at one
> point. I've been meaning to redo them, but have never had the time -
> I haven't forgotten. Of course, all patches welcome :-).



__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
--- packages/language/c/libc/stdio/current/include/stdio.h	Wed Nov 22 13:43:28 2000
+++ packages/language/c/libc/stdio/current/include/stdio.h.patched	Thu Feb  1 07:46:13 2001
@@ -125,6 +125,12 @@
 freopen( const char * /* filename */, const char * /* mode */,
          FILE * /* stream */ );
 
+externC FILE *
+fdopen( int /* descriptor */, const char * /* mode */ );
+
+externC int
+fileno( FILE * /* stream */ );
+
 externC void
 setbuf( FILE * /* stream */, char * /* buffer */ );
 

Re: [ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell?

[Jonathan Larmour]

Martin van Veen wrote:
> 
> I patched
> stdio.h so that fileno and fdopen can be used. Patch is attached...

Thanks. I've fixed this now (in a slightly different way).

Jifl
-- 
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine

Re: [ECOS] What happened to feof & ftell?

[Peter Graf]

Martin van Veen wrote:

>like ftell and feof there is more stuff missing (which I wrote some
>weeks ago, but nobody responded). Fortunately, these functions are
>implemented, but only not mentioned in the stdio.h file. I patched
>stdio.h so that fileno and fdopen can be used. Patch is attached...

Thank you very much. You are right, at least ftell() is available in the
latest CVS snapshot. I've been using an older sourcetree. Thanks for the hint.

All the best

Peter

Re: [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ?

[wangwei]

Hi,Joerg
    As you said , your ecos ported  to m68 is ok.
   Now I want to do the same thing . So I want to know if you prepare to
contribute this porting to redhat or not .
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joerg Rapka" <joerg.rapka@duagon.com>
To: <leenipper@acm.org>
Cc: <ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 8:35 PM
Subject: AW: [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ?


> Hi
>
> I have made a port of eCos to my M68331 based hardware.
> The port is still under development and is not yet contributed
> to Red Hat.
>
> Further interests? - just contact me.
>
> Best regards
>
> Joerg Rapka
>
>
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
> [ mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com]Im Auftrag von Lee Nipper
> Gesendet: Samstag, 27. Januar 2001 05:25
> An: ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
> Betreff: [ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ?
>
>
> Does anyone know of a 68302 (or even 680x0) port
> of eCos ?
>
> thanks,
> ln

[ECOS] 68302 (or 680x0) port ?

[Koh]

Hi all !!
Does anyone know whether
a successful port of ECOS to the 68000 has been accomplished?


Best regards,