* [ECOS] arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support
@ 2009-04-08 13:39 Szentirmai Gergely
2009-04-08 13:59 ` [ECOS] " John Dallaway
2009-04-08 14:16 ` [ECOS] arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support - correction Szentirmai Gergely
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Szentirmai Gergely @ 2009-04-08 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eCos Discuss
Hello
I have discovered an error in spi_at91.cdl
cdl_option CYGHWR_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT91_BUS1 {
active_if CYGINT_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT_HAS_BUS1
display "Enable support for SPI bus 1"
flavor bool
default_value 0
description "Enable this option to add support for the second
SPI peripheral. The most AT91 devices only have one bus"
}
CYGINT_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT_HAS_BUS1 is wrong, CYGINT_DEVS_SPI_ARM_HAS_BUS1
is the right value.
And I added support for SAM7A3, and definitions for the MCI interface.
What is the right way to post my changes?
Thanks!
Gergely Szentirmai
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [ECOS] Re: arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support
2009-04-08 13:39 [ECOS] arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support Szentirmai Gergely
@ 2009-04-08 13:59 ` John Dallaway
[not found] ` <49DCB2DD.7060101@t-online.hu>
2009-04-10 7:31 ` vibisreenivasan
2009-04-08 14:16 ` [ECOS] arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support - correction Szentirmai Gergely
1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: John Dallaway @ 2009-04-08 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Szentirmai Gergely; +Cc: eCos Discuss
Hi Szentirmai
Szentirmai Gergely wrote:
> I have discovered an error in spi_at91.cdl
>
> cdl_option CYGHWR_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT91_BUS1 {
> active_if CYGINT_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT_HAS_BUS1
> display "Enable support for SPI bus 1"
> flavor bool
> default_value 0
> description "Enable this option to add support for the second
> SPI peripheral. The most AT91 devices only have one bus"
> }
>
> CYGINT_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT_HAS_BUS1 is wrong, CYGINT_DEVS_SPI_ARM_HAS_BUS1
> is the right value.
See Bugzilla 1000737:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000737
> And I added support for SAM7A3, and definitions for the MCI interface.
> What is the right way to post my changes?
Contributions are best made as attachments in Bugzilla. Create a new
Bugzilla report and set the component field to "Patches and contributions".
For changes to existing code, please generate a patch against the latest
sources in our CVS repository using "cvs -q diff -U5". For new files and
packages, simply generate a compressed tarball (.tar.bz2).
The eCos maintainers will then review your contribution.
Thank you
John Dallaway
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support - correction
2009-04-08 13:39 [ECOS] arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support Szentirmai Gergely
2009-04-08 13:59 ` [ECOS] " John Dallaway
@ 2009-04-08 14:16 ` Szentirmai Gergely
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Szentirmai Gergely @ 2009-04-08 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eCos Discuss
Just a correction:
CYGINT_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT91_HAS_BUS1 is the right one
Szentirmai Gergely Ărta:
> Hello
>
> I have discovered an error in spi_at91.cdl
>
> cdl_option CYGHWR_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT91_BUS1 {
> active_if CYGINT_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT_HAS_BUS1
> display "Enable support for SPI bus 1"
> flavor bool
> default_value 0
> description "Enable this option to add support for the second
> SPI peripheral. The most AT91 devices only have one
> bus"
> }
>
>
> CYGINT_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT_HAS_BUS1 is wrong, CYGINT_DEVS_SPI_ARM_HAS_BUS1
> is the right value.
>
> And I added support for SAM7A3, and definitions for the MCI interface.
> What is the right way to post my changes?
>
> Thanks!
> Gergely Szentirmai
>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] Re: arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support
[not found] ` <49DCB2DD.7060101@t-online.hu>
@ 2009-04-08 21:06 ` John Dallaway
2009-04-09 12:11 ` Peter Niebert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: John Dallaway @ 2009-04-08 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Szentirmai Gergely; +Cc: eCos Discuss
Hi Szentirmai
Szentirmai Gergely wrote:
> I have downloaded ecos 3.0 final from the ftp. How can I check it out
> from the CVS (to make the diff)?
> I use the anon cvs, but the sources are from ecos 2.0 I think.
> I used to checkout with this command:
> cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anoncvs@ecos.sourceware.org:/cvs/ecos co -P ecos
You can update your checkout to the latest eCos sources in CVS using:
cd ecos/packages/
cvs -q up -d -P
or you can checkout the latest sources into a new directory using the
same command you used previously.
John Dallaway
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] Re: arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support
2009-04-08 21:06 ` John Dallaway
@ 2009-04-09 12:11 ` Peter Niebert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Peter Niebert @ 2009-04-09 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eCos Discuss; +Cc: Szentirmai Gergely, John Dallaway
Just for the record, I was very impressed by the reactivity of the
eCos team. I submitted the bug report and three hours later the fix
was in the cvs. Keep up the good work :-)
Cheers,
-- Peter Niebert
Le 8 avr. 09 à 16:38, John Dallaway a écrit :
> Hi Szentirmai
>
> Szentirmai Gergely wrote:
>
>> I have downloaded ecos 3.0 final from the ftp. How can I check it out
>> from the CVS (to make the diff)?
>> I use the anon cvs, but the sources are from ecos 2.0 I think.
>> I used to checkout with this command:
>> cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anoncvs@ecos.sourceware.org:/cvs/ecos co -P ecos
>
> You can update your checkout to the latest eCos sources in CVS using:
>
> cd ecos/packages/
> cvs -q up -d -P
>
> or you can checkout the latest sources into a new directory using the
> same command you used previously.
>
> John Dallaway
>
> --
> Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
> and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-
> discuss
>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [ECOS] Re: arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support
2009-04-08 13:59 ` [ECOS] " John Dallaway
[not found] ` <49DCB2DD.7060101@t-online.hu>
@ 2009-04-10 7:31 ` vibisreenivasan
2009-04-10 9:06 ` John Dallaway
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: vibisreenivasan @ 2009-04-10 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Dallaway; +Cc: eCos Discuss
hi John,
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 14:39 +0100, John Dallaway wrote:
> Hi Szentirmai
>
> Szentirmai Gergely wrote:
>
> > I have discovered an error in spi_at91.cdl
> >
> > cdl_option CYGHWR_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT91_BUS1 {
> > active_if CYGINT_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT_HAS_BUS1
> > display "Enable support for SPI bus 1"
> > flavor bool
> > default_value 0
> > description "Enable this option to add support for the
second
> > SPI peripheral. The most AT91 devices only have
one bus"
> > }
> >
> > CYGINT_DEVS_SPI_ARM_AT_HAS_BUS1 is wrong,
CYGINT_DEVS_SPI_ARM_HAS_BUS1
> > is the right value.
>
> See Bugzilla 1000737:
>
> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000737
>
> > And I added support for SAM7A3, and definitions for the MCI
interface.
> > What is the right way to post my changes?
>
> Contributions are best made as attachments in Bugzilla. Create a new
> Bugzilla report and set the component field to "Patches and
contributions".
>
Cant we use ecos-patches mailing list to send patches.
In fact i have send a patch for adding I2C support for AT91 H/W.
But i didnt get any review comments from maintainers.
> For changes to existing code, please generate a patch against the
latest
> sources in our CVS repository using "cvs -q diff -U5". For new files
and
> packages, simply generate a compressed tarball (.tar.bz2).
>
> The eCos maintainers will then review your contribution.
>
> Thank you
>
> John Dallaway
Thanks & regards
vibi
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [ECOS] Re: arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support
2009-04-10 7:31 ` vibisreenivasan
@ 2009-04-10 9:06 ` John Dallaway
2009-04-10 17:35 ` Szentirmai Gergely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: John Dallaway @ 2009-04-10 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vibi_sreenivasan; +Cc: eCos Discussion
vibisreenivasan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 14:39 +0100, John Dallaway wrote:
>
>> Szentirmai Gergely wrote:
>>
>>> What is the right way to post my changes?
>>
>> Contributions are best made as attachments in Bugzilla. Create a new
>> Bugzilla report and set the component field to "Patches and
>> contributions".
>
> Cant we use ecos-patches mailing list to send patches.
> In fact i have send a patch for adding I2C support for AT91 H/W.
I prefer using Bugzilla because it keeps all correspondence in one
place, but posting contributions to the ecos-patches list should also
work. One of the maintainers will review your patch in due course.
Thank you for your contribution
John Dallaway
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [ECOS] Re: arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support
2009-04-10 9:06 ` John Dallaway
@ 2009-04-10 17:35 ` Szentirmai Gergely
2009-04-11 10:43 ` John Dallaway
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Szentirmai Gergely @ 2009-04-10 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eCos Discuss
Hello
I wanted to create an account on bugzilla, but the reg mail has not
arrived. Theres a mail address, where you can ask the admin, but it was
unable to deliver my mail to the admin:
<bugzilla@ecoscentric.com> (expanded from <bugzilla-admin@ecoscentric.com>):
host mail.ecoscentric.com[/var/lib/imap/socket/lmtp] said: 550-Mailbox
unknown. Either there is no mailbox associated with this 550-name
or you
do not have authorization to see it. 550 5.1.1 User unknown (in
reply to
RCPT TO command)
So, what's next? :D
Gergely Szentirmai
John Dallaway Ãrta:
> vibisreenivasan wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 14:39 +0100, John Dallaway wrote:
>>
>>> Szentirmai Gergely wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is the right way to post my changes?
>>> Contributions are best made as attachments in Bugzilla. Create a new
>>> Bugzilla report and set the component field to "Patches and
>>> contributions".
>> Cant we use ecos-patches mailing list to send patches.
>> In fact i have send a patch for adding I2C support for AT91 H/W.
>
> I prefer using Bugzilla because it keeps all correspondence in one
> place, but posting contributions to the ecos-patches list should also
> work. One of the maintainers will review your patch in due course.
>
> Thank you for your contribution
>
> John Dallaway
>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [ECOS] Re: arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support
2009-04-10 17:35 ` Szentirmai Gergely
@ 2009-04-11 10:43 ` John Dallaway
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: John Dallaway @ 2009-04-11 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Szentirmai Gergely; +Cc: eCos Discussion
Szentirmai Gergely wrote:
> I wanted to create an account on bugzilla, but the reg mail has not
> arrived. Theres a mail address, where you can ask the admin, but it was
> unable to deliver my mail to the admin:
>
> <bugzilla@ecoscentric.com> (expanded from
> <bugzilla-admin@ecoscentric.com>):
> host mail.ecoscentric.com[/var/lib/imap/socket/lmtp] said: 550-Mailbox
> unknown. Either there is no mailbox associated with this 550-name
> or you
> do not have authorization to see it. 550 5.1.1 User unknown (in
> reply to
> RCPT TO command)
>
> So, what's next? :D
Automated e-mails from Bugzilla might be blocked by certain spam
filters. Try registering for Bugzilla using another e-mail address if
you have one. Otherwise, e-mail to sysadmin@ecoscentric.com should reach
someone who can help.
John Dallaway
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-11 8:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-08 13:39 [ECOS] arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support Szentirmai Gergely
2009-04-08 13:59 ` [ECOS] " John Dallaway
[not found] ` <49DCB2DD.7060101@t-online.hu>
2009-04-08 21:06 ` John Dallaway
2009-04-09 12:11 ` Peter Niebert
2009-04-10 7:31 ` vibisreenivasan
2009-04-10 9:06 ` John Dallaway
2009-04-10 17:35 ` Szentirmai Gergely
2009-04-11 10:43 ` John Dallaway
2009-04-08 14:16 ` [ECOS] arm SPI1 cdl bugfix, new variant support - correction Szentirmai Gergely
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).