* [ECOS] gcc4.0 errors
@ 2005-05-27 12:09 Jani Monoses
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jani Monoses @ 2005-05-27 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ecos-discuss
Hello
with gcc4.0 for ARM I needed to remove -mno-short-load-words and -finit-priorities since
support for switches was removed (the former removed already in 3.4)
Is there any reason for keeping them around?
From what I read -finit-priorities was ignored by gcc anyway and no-short-loads (or
malignment-traps as it is known in gcc 3.4) is neede only on pre ARMv4 architectures.
There are a few other warnings, mostly signedness differences in function arguments
passing throughout the sources.
Jani
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-05-26 13:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-27 12:09 [ECOS] gcc4.0 errors Jani Monoses
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).