public inbox for ecos-maintainers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Dallaway <jld@ecoscentric.com>
To: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: New CPM/DPRAM allocator
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200303191019.45969.jld@ecoscentric.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1048014798.7462.3684.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org>

Hello eCos maintainers

I'm concerned to read of the incompatibility between newer eCos builds and 
older RedBoot builds due to the new CPM/DPRAM allocator. If I understand 
correctly:

a) The incompatibility which has arisen was not intentional.
b) The new allocator is highly desirable.
c) There does not appear to be any way to avoid the incompatibility 
robustly.

A few of questions:

1) Does this incompatibilty affect _all_ targets which run both RedBoot and 
eCos?
2) Could the new allocator implementation be modified in any way to preserve 
compatibility?
3) To what extent might the new allocator perturb eCos functionality other 
than by a stepwise "it will work or it will be completely broken".
4) Is a further break in compatibility possible as potential issues with the 
new allocator are ironed out?

We need to determine how to manage the switch over to the new CPM/DPRAM 
allocator smoothly for everyone. From my perspective, it is certainly 
unfortunate that this innovation has arrived between 2.0 beta and 2.0 
final. Were it not for the break in compatibility, I would vote against 
incorporating this change for 2.0 final since the change will (to a certain 
extent) invalidate beta testing by the net community. However, it would 
also be undesirable for 2.0 final RedBoot to be incompatible with anonCVS 
eCos from day 1. Users are likely to want to stick with a release version 
of the firmware while experimenting with eCos from anonCVS.

John Dallaway

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-19 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-18  8:47 Patches for the eCos 2.0 branch John Dallaway
2003-03-18 13:48 ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-18 16:04   ` Proposal for processing patches " John Dallaway
2003-03-18 17:25     ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-03-18 18:21       ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-18 18:56     ` Andrew Lunn
2003-04-12  5:00       ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-04-14  7:28         ` Andrew Lunn
2003-03-18 19:01     ` Andrew Lunn
2003-03-18 22:58       ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-03-18 19:16     ` SNMP for FreeBSD Andrew Lunn
2003-03-19 13:22       ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-03-19 14:23         ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-19 18:07         ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-25 17:01       ` Andrew Lunn
2003-03-19 14:22     ` 2.0 branch: mn10300 debug info patch Bart Veer
2003-03-19 14:40       ` John Dallaway
2003-03-19 18:07       ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-18 18:09   ` Patches for the eCos 2.0 branch Nick Garnett
2003-03-18 18:25     ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-18 19:05       ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-18 19:13         ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-19 10:18           ` John Dallaway [this message]
2003-03-19 13:02             ` New CPM/DPRAM allocator Nick Garnett
2003-03-19 14:38               ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-19 15:44               ` John Dallaway
2003-03-19 17:06                 ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-19 18:22                   ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-19 18:26                     ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-19 18:52                       ` Nick Garnett
     [not found]                         ` <1048100525.7462.5617.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org>
2003-03-19 19:21                           ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-20 13:02                           ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-20 13:14                             ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-20 18:11                               ` Nick Garnett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200303191019.45969.jld@ecoscentric.com \
    --to=jld@ecoscentric.com \
    --cc=ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).