From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl@eCosCentric.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew.lunn@ascom.ch>
Cc: ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Proposal for processing patches for the eCos 2.0 branch
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E77A421.8010209@eCosCentric.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030318190053.GF17373@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch>
Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> Is there some sort of time plan for 2.0 final? The longer it takes,
> the more patches from the trunk we will want to put into the branch.
We were saying the same earlier over lunch :-). While the "official"
answer to give the net is always "when it's ready" (although it never
really will be, arguably), we should aim for a month or so - enough time
for feedback, but not enough time for serious divergence.
It's possible we can do some sort of rolling snapshot releases from the
trunk, but the overhead and care and feeding may be too difficult, as well
as the inevitable support questions (it can be _good_ to put the "barrier"
of CVS in the way!).
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-18 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-18 8:47 Patches " John Dallaway
2003-03-18 13:48 ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-18 16:04 ` Proposal for processing patches " John Dallaway
2003-03-18 17:25 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-03-18 18:21 ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-18 18:56 ` Andrew Lunn
2003-04-12 5:00 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-04-14 7:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2003-03-18 19:01 ` Andrew Lunn
2003-03-18 22:58 ` Jonathan Larmour [this message]
2003-03-18 19:16 ` SNMP for FreeBSD Andrew Lunn
2003-03-19 13:22 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-03-19 14:23 ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-19 18:07 ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-25 17:01 ` Andrew Lunn
2003-03-19 14:22 ` 2.0 branch: mn10300 debug info patch Bart Veer
2003-03-19 14:40 ` John Dallaway
2003-03-19 18:07 ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-18 18:09 ` Patches for the eCos 2.0 branch Nick Garnett
2003-03-18 18:25 ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-18 19:05 ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-18 19:13 ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-19 10:18 ` New CPM/DPRAM allocator John Dallaway
2003-03-19 13:02 ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-19 14:38 ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-19 15:44 ` John Dallaway
2003-03-19 17:06 ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-19 18:22 ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-19 18:26 ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-19 18:52 ` Nick Garnett
[not found] ` <1048100525.7462.5617.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org>
2003-03-19 19:21 ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-20 13:02 ` Nick Garnett
2003-03-20 13:14 ` Gary Thomas
2003-03-20 18:11 ` Nick Garnett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E77A421.8010209@eCosCentric.com \
--to=jifl@ecoscentric.com \
--cc=andrew.lunn@ascom.ch \
--cc=ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).