* Aproval: all template change to FreeBSD
@ 2003-04-29 13:48 Andrew Lunn
2003-04-29 22:37 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2003-04-29 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eCos Maintainers
Aprovel for Beta2.0 branch:
Name: All template FreeBSD + HTTPD
What: Changes the all template to use the newer FreeBSD stack rather
than the older OpenBSD stack. This brings it into line with the net
template. I also added the httpd package which was missing.
Affected: Network stack and all packages that depend on it.
Risks: Invalidates any network tests done using the all tempate!
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Aproval: all template change to FreeBSD
2003-04-29 13:48 Aproval: all template change to FreeBSD Andrew Lunn
@ 2003-04-29 22:37 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-04-30 7:51 ` John Dallaway
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2003-04-29 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn; +Cc: eCos Maintainers
Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Aprovel for Beta2.0 branch:
>
> Name: All template FreeBSD + HTTPD
>
> What: Changes the all template to use the newer FreeBSD stack rather
> than the older OpenBSD stack. This brings it into line with the net
> template. I also added the httpd package which was missing.
>
> Affected: Network stack and all packages that depend on it.
>
> Risks: Invalidates any network tests done using the all tempate!
I'll defer this to John - we're about to try and do some final testing
here (I'm tasked with NT, joy) so it may be a little late and it's not
critical. My guess is not.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Aproval: all template change to FreeBSD
2003-04-29 22:37 ` Jonathan Larmour
@ 2003-04-30 7:51 ` John Dallaway
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: John Dallaway @ 2003-04-30 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn; +Cc: eCos Maintainers
Hi Andrew
I'm all for consistency and it's a shame we didn't spot this earlier.
Fortunately, it's easy enough to workaround. On balance, I would prefer to
leave this as a 'known issue' for 2.0 final. I will raise a Bugzilla
report.
John Dallaway
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Larmour
Date: Tuesday 29 Apr 2003 23:37
Subject: Re: Aproval: all template change to FreeBSD
> Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Aprovel for Beta2.0 branch:
> >
> > Name: All template FreeBSD + HTTPD
> >
> > What: Changes the all template to use the newer FreeBSD stack rather
> > than the older OpenBSD stack. This brings it into line with the net
> > template. I also added the httpd package which was missing.
> >
> > Affected: Network stack and all packages that depend on it.
> >
> > Risks: Invalidates any network tests done using the all tempate!
>
> I'll defer this to John - we're about to try and do some final testing
> here (I'm tasked with NT, joy) so it may be a little late and it's not
> critical. My guess is not.
>
> Jifl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-30 7:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-29 13:48 Aproval: all template change to FreeBSD Andrew Lunn
2003-04-29 22:37 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-04-30 7:51 ` John Dallaway
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).