* Making Jani Monoses a maintainer
@ 2004-04-15 7:54 Andrew Lunn
2004-04-15 15:06 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2004-04-15 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eCos Maintainers
Hi Folks
Jifl mentioned a while back we should try to get more people
interested in being a maintainer....
I sounded out Jani Monoses to see if he would be interested in
maintaining lwip in the eCos tree. He said yes. He has had some
experience with maintain opens source code. He has commit rights to
lwip. So maintaining lwip in eCos should not be too big a problem for
him.
What do others think?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Making Jani Monoses a maintainer
2004-04-15 7:54 Making Jani Monoses a maintainer Andrew Lunn
@ 2004-04-15 15:06 ` Jonathan Larmour
2004-04-15 15:09 ` Gary Thomas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2004-04-15 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn; +Cc: eCos Maintainers
Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Hi Folks
>
> Jifl mentioned a while back we should try to get more people
> interested in being a maintainer....
>
> I sounded out Jani Monoses to see if he would be interested in
> maintaining lwip in the eCos tree. He said yes. He has had some
> experience with maintain opens source code. He has commit rights to
> lwip. So maintaining lwip in eCos should not be too big a problem for
> him.
>
> What do others think?
I'd support it. I think he can have free rein in the lwip tree, although
obviously he has to be up to speed on things like licenses and. where
relevant, assignments and so on. Outside of the lwip tree, I'd prefer
checkin-after-approval only for the time being.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Making Jani Monoses a maintainer
2004-04-15 15:06 ` Jonathan Larmour
@ 2004-04-15 15:09 ` Gary Thomas
2004-04-15 15:42 ` Nick Garnett
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gary Thomas @ 2004-04-15 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: Andrew Lunn, eCos Maintainers
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 09:06, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Hi Folks
> >
> > Jifl mentioned a while back we should try to get more people
> > interested in being a maintainer....
> >
> > I sounded out Jani Monoses to see if he would be interested in
> > maintaining lwip in the eCos tree. He said yes. He has had some
> > experience with maintain opens source code. He has commit rights to
> > lwip. So maintaining lwip in eCos should not be too big a problem for
> > him.
> >
> > What do others think?
>
> I'd support it. I think he can have free rein in the lwip tree, although
> obviously he has to be up to speed on things like licenses and. where
> relevant, assignments and so on. Outside of the lwip tree, I'd prefer
> checkin-after-approval only for the time being.
I concur.
--
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Making Jani Monoses a maintainer
2004-04-15 15:09 ` Gary Thomas
@ 2004-04-15 15:42 ` Nick Garnett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nick Garnett @ 2004-04-15 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gary Thomas; +Cc: Jonathan Larmour, Andrew Lunn, eCos Maintainers
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> writes:
> On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 09:06, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> > Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > Hi Folks
> > >
> > > Jifl mentioned a while back we should try to get more people
> > > interested in being a maintainer....
> > >
> > > I sounded out Jani Monoses to see if he would be interested in
> > > maintaining lwip in the eCos tree. He said yes. He has had some
> > > experience with maintain opens source code. He has commit rights to
> > > lwip. So maintaining lwip in eCos should not be too big a problem for
> > > him.
> > >
> > > What do others think?
> >
> > I'd support it. I think he can have free rein in the lwip tree, although
> > obviously he has to be up to speed on things like licenses and. where
> > relevant, assignments and so on. Outside of the lwip tree, I'd prefer
> > checkin-after-approval only for the time being.
>
> I concur.
Me too.
--
Nick Garnett eCos Kernel Architect
http://www.ecoscentric.com The eCos and RedBoot experts
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-15 15:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-15 7:54 Making Jani Monoses a maintainer Andrew Lunn
2004-04-15 15:06 ` Jonathan Larmour
2004-04-15 15:09 ` Gary Thomas
2004-04-15 15:42 ` Nick Garnett
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).