Making Jani Monoses a maintainer

Making Jani Monoses a maintainer

[Andrew Lunn]

Hi Folks

Jifl mentioned a while back we should try to get more people
interested in being a maintainer....

I sounded out Jani Monoses to see if he would be interested in
maintaining lwip in the eCos tree. He said yes. He has had some
experience with maintain opens source code. He has commit rights to
lwip. So maintaining lwip in eCos should not be too big a problem for
him.

What do others think?

     Andrew

Re: Making Jani Monoses a maintainer

[Jonathan Larmour]

Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Hi Folks
> 
> Jifl mentioned a while back we should try to get more people
> interested in being a maintainer....
> 
> I sounded out Jani Monoses to see if he would be interested in
> maintaining lwip in the eCos tree. He said yes. He has had some
> experience with maintain opens source code. He has commit rights to
> lwip. So maintaining lwip in eCos should not be too big a problem for
> him.
> 
> What do others think?

I'd support it. I think he can have free rein in the lwip tree, although 
obviously he has to be up to speed on things like licenses and. where 
relevant, assignments and so on. Outside of the lwip tree, I'd prefer 
checkin-after-approval only for the time being.

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

Re: Making Jani Monoses a maintainer

[Gary Thomas]

On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 09:06, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Hi Folks
> > 
> > Jifl mentioned a while back we should try to get more people
> > interested in being a maintainer....
> > 
> > I sounded out Jani Monoses to see if he would be interested in
> > maintaining lwip in the eCos tree. He said yes. He has had some
> > experience with maintain opens source code. He has commit rights to
> > lwip. So maintaining lwip in eCos should not be too big a problem for
> > him.
> > 
> > What do others think?
> 
> I'd support it. I think he can have free rein in the lwip tree, although 
> obviously he has to be up to speed on things like licenses and. where 
> relevant, assignments and so on. Outside of the lwip tree, I'd prefer 
> checkin-after-approval only for the time being.

I concur.

-- 
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates

Re: Making Jani Monoses a maintainer

[Nick Garnett]

Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> writes:

> On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 09:06, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> > Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > Hi Folks
> > > 
> > > Jifl mentioned a while back we should try to get more people
> > > interested in being a maintainer....
> > > 
> > > I sounded out Jani Monoses to see if he would be interested in
> > > maintaining lwip in the eCos tree. He said yes. He has had some
> > > experience with maintain opens source code. He has commit rights to
> > > lwip. So maintaining lwip in eCos should not be too big a problem for
> > > him.
> > > 
> > > What do others think?
> > 
> > I'd support it. I think he can have free rein in the lwip tree, although 
> > obviously he has to be up to speed on things like licenses and. where 
> > relevant, assignments and so on. Outside of the lwip tree, I'd prefer 
> > checkin-after-approval only for the time being.
> 
> I concur.

Me too.

-- 
Nick Garnett                    eCos Kernel Architect
http://www.ecoscentric.com      The eCos and RedBoot experts