Re: make check fails for version 0.189 on aarch64

[Jonatan Schlag <jonatan.schlag@ipfire.org>]

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the prompt response. This error is now resolved. The test
suite is happy. Turns out, it was a problem in then underlying image.
After we updated it, the error went away.

Greetings Jonatan

Am Freitag, dem 15.09.2023 um 23:24 +0200 schrieb Mark Wielaard:
> Hi Jonatan,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 08:42:28PM +0200, Jonatan Schlag via
> Elfutils-devel wrote:
> > I'm currently trying to build elfutils in version 0.189 on an
> > aarch64
> > system. Unfortunately, make check fails with the following errors:
> > 
> > https://nopaste.ipfire.org/view/Sx7pjy4g
> > 
> > The full log can be found here:
> > 
> > https://pakfire.ipfire.org/jobs/28a23239-80a6-4a24-b506-dbc367d96afa/log
> > 
> > The same configuration works on x86_64. I currently run out of
> > ideas
> > what to try next. I know that the test suite passes on Debian for
> > aarch64. So there must be an error with the system itself, but as
> > said,
> > I lack ideas how to debug this further.
> > 
> > Some input would be highly appreciated.
> 
> So you only got 4 FAILs.
> 
> FAIL: run-backtrace-native.sh
> FAIL: run-backtrace-dwarf.sh
> FAIL: run-backtrace-native-core.sh
> FAIL: run-deleted.sh
> 
> And they all seem to fail in the same way. You get a backtrace, but
> almost all symbol names come out empty/null.
> 
> But your configure line does contain -g so you should at least get it
> for the elfutils libraries and (test) programs. The only possible
> issue with your configure line is the use of -fdebug-prefix-map which
> I believe doesn't work correctly when also using LTO.
> 
> And maybe your /usr/lib64/libc.so.6 might not have any symbols?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mark