public inbox for fortran@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel@kitware.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, nathan@acm.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org, brad.king@kitware.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] c++modules: report imported CMI files as dependencies
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 22:45:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230623024559.GA255658@farprobe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <734eef7c-f7c3-519c-e007-cb42f8dc8a82@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 17:21:42 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 1/25/23 16:06, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > They affect the build, so report them via `-MF` mechanisms.
> 
> Why isn't this covered by the existing code in preprocessed_module?

It appears as though it is neutered in patch 3 where
`write_make_modules_deps` is used in `make_write` (or will use that name
in v7 once I finish up testing). This logic cannot be used for p1689
output because it assumes the location and names of CMI files (`.c++m`)
that will be necessary (it is related to the `CXX_IMPORTS +=` GNU
make/libcody extensions that will, e.g., cause `ninja` to choke if it is
read from `-MF` output as it uses "fancier" Makefile syntax than tools
that are not actually `make` are going to be willing to support). This
codepath is the *actual* filename being read at compile time and is
relevant at all times; it may duplicate what `preprocessed_module` sets
up.

I'm also realizing that this is why I need to pass `-fdeps-format=p1689`
when compiling…there may need to be another, more idiomatic, way to
disable this additional syntax usage in `-MF` output.

--Ben

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-23  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-25 21:06 [PATCH v5 0/5] P1689R5 support Ben Boeckel
2023-01-25 21:06 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] libcpp: reject codepoints above 0x10FFFF Ben Boeckel
2023-02-13 15:53   ` Jason Merrill
2023-05-12 14:26     ` Ben Boeckel
2023-01-25 21:06 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] libcpp: add a function to determine UTF-8 validity of a C string Ben Boeckel
2023-10-23 15:16   ` David Malcolm
2023-10-23 15:24     ` Jason Merrill
2023-10-23 15:28       ` David Malcolm
2023-01-25 21:06 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] p1689r5: initial support Ben Boeckel
2023-02-14 21:50   ` Jason Merrill
2023-05-12 14:24     ` Ben Boeckel
2023-06-19 21:33       ` Jason Merrill
2023-06-20 16:51         ` Ben Boeckel
2023-06-20 19:46     ` Ben Boeckel
2023-06-23 18:31       ` Jason Merrill
2023-06-25 17:08         ` Ben Boeckel
2023-01-25 21:06 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] c++modules: report imported CMI files as dependencies Ben Boeckel
2023-02-13 18:33   ` Jason Merrill
2023-05-12 14:26     ` Ben Boeckel
2023-06-22 21:21   ` Jason Merrill
2023-06-23  2:45     ` Ben Boeckel [this message]
2023-06-23 12:12       ` Nathan Sidwell
2023-06-25 16:36         ` Ben Boeckel
2023-07-18 20:52           ` Jason Merrill
2023-07-18 21:12             ` Nathan Sidwell
2023-07-19  0:01             ` Ben Boeckel
2023-07-19 21:11               ` Nathan Sidwell
2023-07-20  0:47                 ` Ben Boeckel
2023-07-20 21:00                   ` Nathan Sidwell
2023-07-21 14:57                     ` Ben Boeckel
2023-07-21 20:23                       ` Nathan Sidwell
2023-07-24  0:26                         ` Ben Boeckel
2023-07-28  1:13                           ` Jason Merrill
2023-07-29 14:25                             ` Ben Boeckel
2023-01-25 21:06 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] c++modules: report module mapper files as a dependency Ben Boeckel
2023-06-23 14:44   ` Jason Merrill
2023-06-25 16:42     ` Ben Boeckel
2023-02-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] P1689R5 support Ben Boeckel
2023-02-02 20:24 ` Harald Anlauf
2023-02-03  4:00   ` Ben Boeckel
2023-02-03  4:07 ` Andrew Pinski
2023-02-03  8:58   ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-02-03  9:10     ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-02-03 14:52       ` Ben Boeckel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230623024559.GA255658@farprobe \
    --to=ben.boeckel@kitware.com \
    --cc=brad.king@kitware.com \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=nathan@acm.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).