From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
To: Mikael Morin <morin-mikael@orange.fr>,
fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: use name of array component in runtime error message [PR30802]
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 20:56:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86888cc5-3650-4044-b67d-89aab1631753@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67c77b44-79cb-4029-b59a-c92dfad15fa9@orange.fr>
Hi Mikael,
Am 28.01.24 um 12:39 schrieb Mikael Morin:
> Le 24/01/2024 à 22:39, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
>> Dear all,
>>
>> this patch is actually only a followup fix to generate the proper name
>> of an array reference in derived-type components for the runtime error
>> message generated for the bounds-checking code. Without the proper
>> part ref, not only a user may get confused: I was, too...
>>
>> The testcase is compile-only, as it is only important to check the
>> strings used in the error messages.
>>
>> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Harald
>>
> Hello,
>
> the change proper looks good, and is an improvement. But I'm a little
> concerned by the production of references like in the test x1%vv%z which
> could be confusing and is strictly speaking invalid fortran (multiple
> non-scalar components). Did you consider generating x1%vv(?,?)%zz or
> x1%vv(...)%z or similar?
yes, that seems very reasonable, given that this is what NAG does.
We also have spurious %_data in some error messages that I'll try
to get rid off.
> There is another nit about the test, which has dg-output and
> dg-shouldfail despite being only a compile-time test.
I'll remove that. With gcc-13 the runtime check would trigger
in the wrong line but the failure of the check is dealt with
by another testcase in gcc-14.
> Otherwise looks good.
>
> Mikael
I'll come up with a revised patch. Thanks for the feedback so far!
Harald
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-28 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 21:39 Harald Anlauf
2024-01-28 11:39 ` Mikael Morin
2024-01-28 19:56 ` Harald Anlauf [this message]
2024-01-28 21:43 ` Steve Kargl
2024-01-29 6:51 ` rep.dot.nop
2024-01-29 17:25 ` Harald Anlauf
2024-01-29 20:50 ` Harald Anlauf
2024-01-30 10:38 ` Mikael Morin
2024-01-30 10:46 ` Mikael Morin
2024-03-10 21:31 ` [PATCH, v2] " Harald Anlauf
2024-03-15 16:31 ` Mikael Morin
2024-03-15 17:26 ` Harald Anlauf
2024-03-15 19:29 ` Mikael Morin
2024-03-20 20:24 ` [PATCH, v3] Fortran: improve array component description " Harald Anlauf
2024-03-21 13:07 ` Mikael Morin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86888cc5-3650-4044-b67d-89aab1631753@gmx.de \
--to=anlauf@gmx.de \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=morin-mikael@orange.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).