public inbox for fortran@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>,
	Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR37336 finalization
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 07:32:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGkQGiJpL99oDH9Mw+t6pCSx25LWWVVpeys2Ui0fVr-i=bm4_Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <582085ac-0d07-a516-732d-e82e0a4e01c9@netcologne.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1998 bytes --]

Hi Thomas and Steve,

Last night, I scoped out the work required to get the patch ready to
commit. Sorting out the testcases will be the main load since they have
grown "organically". I propose to change over to one test for each
paragraph of F2018 7.5.6.2/7.5.6.3 and to verify them against the other
brands. I suspect that this will allow a weeding out of the existing tests.
It will take me a couple of weeks.

Could you please review the patch on that self same time scale? I would be
happy to have feedback one file at a time.

Salvatore alerted me to an ICE on valid, which occurs with -fcheck=all.
Eliminating the assert at trans.cc:1101 fixes it. I am not convinced that
the line does anything useful now and so consider it to be erased. I
suspect that future bugs will result from components that are finalizable
and allocatable and so I will be paying close attention to it.

In the course of the last few months, I have found that the associate
construct causes a lot of niggles. Looking at pr87477, I see that I fixed a
number of the dependencies a while since, on a branch other than the
development branch of the time. As a result, the fixes got lost. I will
turn to pr87477 just as soon as pr37336 is done and dusted.

Cheers

Paul


On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 14:58, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:

> Paul,
>
> first of all, thank you very much indeed for the hard work you put into
> this!  This is a great step for gfortran.
>
> > I can hurry this along to get the patch
> > into 13-branch or I can wait until 14-branch opens.
>
> Personally, I think that this fixes so many bugs, and makes
> the compiler so much better, that I would prefer having it
> in gcc-13.  Finalization was only of very limited use before,
> and the risk of meaningful regressions (short of a build
> failure) is therefore very low.
>
> Again, thanks a lot!
>
> Best regards
>
>         Thomas
>
>
>
>

-- 
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" -
Albert Einstein

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-08  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-07 13:45 Paul Richard Thomas
2023-03-07 14:58 ` Thomas Koenig
2023-03-07 17:15   ` Steve Kargl
2023-03-08  7:32   ` Paul Richard Thomas [this message]
2023-03-08  8:05     ` Thomas Koenig
2023-03-08  8:14       ` Richard Biener
2023-03-08  8:55         ` Thomas Koenig
2023-03-08  9:10           ` Richard Biener
2023-03-08 12:27             ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-03-08 10:28           ` Tobias Burnus
2023-03-08  9:14       ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-03-08  9:21         ` Richard Biener
2023-03-08 14:55           ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-03-08 14:57             ` Richard Biener
2023-03-08 21:35             ` Thomas Koenig
2023-03-09  7:13               ` Thomas Koenig
2023-03-09  8:32                 ` Richard Biener
2023-03-09  8:18               ` Richard Biener
2023-03-09 12:43                 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-03-09 17:30                   ` Thomas Koenig
2023-03-10  3:56                     ` Jerry D
2023-03-10 16:49                     ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-03-15  7:29                       ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-03-15  7:37                         ` Richard Biener
2023-03-16  7:20                           ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-03-09 15:05                 ` Steve Kargl
2023-03-08 15:12     ` Steve Kargl
2023-03-08 15:29       ` Andrew Benson
2023-03-08 16:29       ` Tobias Burnus
2023-03-08 17:12         ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-06-02 13:42 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-06-03  5:50   ` Thomas Koenig
2023-06-03  7:32     ` Steve Kargl
2023-06-03 13:16     ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-06-03 19:10       ` Harald Anlauf
2023-06-03 19:22       ` Thomas Koenig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGkQGiJpL99oDH9Mw+t6pCSx25LWWVVpeys2Ui0fVr-i=bm4_Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu \
    --cc=tkoenig@netcologne.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).