public inbox for fortran@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [patch, fortran] PR107397 ICE in gfc_arith_plus, at fortran/arith.cc:654
@ 2022-12-17 17:12 Jerry D
  2022-12-19 10:29 ` [committed] testsuite: Fix up pr107397.f90 test [PR107397] Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jerry D @ 2022-12-17 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gfortran, gcc-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 324 bytes --]

Hi all,

The attached patch fixes a regression and is a patch from Steve.  I have 
regression tested it and provided a test case.  It is fairly simple and 
I will commit under the "simple" rule in a little while.

Thanks Steve for Patch. Thanks Harald for helping me get back up to 
speed on the git magic.

Regards,

Jerry

[-- Attachment #2: patch1.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1117 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
index 0f9b2ced4c2..1562dc22bc6 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
@@ -2221,6 +2221,14 @@ add_init_expr_to_sym (const char *name, gfc_expr **initp, locus *var_locus)
 	    sym->ts.f90_type = init->ts.f90_type;
 	}
 
+      /* Catch the case:  type(t), parameter :: x = z'1'.  */
+      if (sym->ts.type == BT_DERIVED && init->ts.type == BT_BOZ)
+	{
+	  gfc_error ("Entity %qs at %L is incompatible with a BOZ "
+		     "literal constant", name, &sym->declared_at);
+	  return false;
+	}
+
       /* Add initializer.  Make sure we keep the ranks sane.  */
       if (sym->attr.dimension && init->rank == 0)
 	{
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr107397.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr107397.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4592a275e70
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr107397.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+!{ dg-do compile }
+!
+program p
+  type t
+    real :: a = 1.0
+  end type
+  type(t), parameter :: x = z'1' ! { dg-error "incompatible with BOZ" }
+  x%a = x%a + 2 ! { dg-error "has no IMPLICIT type"}
+end

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [committed] testsuite: Fix up pr107397.f90 test [PR107397]
  2022-12-17 17:12 [patch, fortran] PR107397 ICE in gfc_arith_plus, at fortran/arith.cc:654 Jerry D
@ 2022-12-19 10:29 ` Jakub Jelinek
  2022-12-20  2:07   ` Jerry D
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2022-12-19 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jerry D; +Cc: gfortran, gcc-patches

On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 09:12:43AM -0800, Jerry D via Gcc-patches wrote:
> The attached patch fixes a regression and is a patch from Steve.  I have
> regression tested it and provided a test case.  It is fairly simple and I
> will commit under the "simple" rule in a little while.
> 
> Thanks Steve for Patch. Thanks Harald for helping me get back up to speed on
> the git magic.

The pr107397.f90 test FAILs for me, one problem was that the
added diagnostics has an indefinite article before BOZ, but
the test dg-error didn't.  The other problem was that on the
other dg-error there was no space between the string and closing
}, so it was completely ignored and the error was an excess
error.

2022-12-19  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR fortran/107397
	* gfortran.dg/pr107397.f90: Adjust expected diagnostic wording and
	add space between dg-error string and closing }.

--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr107397.f90.jj	2022-12-19 11:09:13.793166473 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr107397.f90	2022-12-19 11:23:02.981322107 +0100
@@ -4,6 +4,6 @@ program p
   type t
     real :: a = 1.0
   end type
-  type(t), parameter :: x = z'1' ! { dg-error "incompatible with BOZ" }
-  x%a = x%a + 2 ! { dg-error "has no IMPLICIT type"}
+  type(t), parameter :: x = z'1' ! { dg-error "incompatible with a BOZ" }
+  x%a = x%a + 2 ! { dg-error "has no IMPLICIT type" }
 end


	Jakub


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [committed] testsuite: Fix up pr107397.f90 test [PR107397]
  2022-12-19 10:29 ` [committed] testsuite: Fix up pr107397.f90 test [PR107397] Jakub Jelinek
@ 2022-12-20  2:07   ` Jerry D
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jerry D @ 2022-12-20  2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: gfortran, gcc-patches

On 12/19/22 2:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 09:12:43AM -0800, Jerry D via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> The attached patch fixes a regression and is a patch from Steve.  I have
>> regression tested it and provided a test case.  It is fairly simple and I
>> will commit under the "simple" rule in a little while.
>>
>> Thanks Steve for Patch. Thanks Harald for helping me get back up to speed on
>> the git magic.
> 
> The pr107397.f90 test FAILs for me, one problem was that the
> added diagnostics has an indefinite article before BOZ, but
> the test dg-error didn't.  The other problem was that on the
> other dg-error there was no space between the string and closing
> }, so it was completely ignored and the error was an excess
> error.
> 
> 2022-12-19  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> 
> 	PR fortran/107397
> 	* gfortran.dg/pr107397.f90: Adjust expected diagnostic wording and
> 	add space between dg-error string and closing }.
=== snip ===

Thanks Jakub.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-20  2:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-12-17 17:12 [patch, fortran] PR107397 ICE in gfc_arith_plus, at fortran/arith.cc:654 Jerry D
2022-12-19 10:29 ` [committed] testsuite: Fix up pr107397.f90 test [PR107397] Jakub Jelinek
2022-12-20  2:07   ` Jerry D

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).