public inbox for frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug general/3784] New: should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
@ 2006-12-22 15:32 cagney at redhat dot com
2006-12-22 17:00 ` [Bug general/3784] " cagney at redhat dot com
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: cagney at redhat dot com @ 2006-12-22 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frysk-bugzilla
dejagnu has the advantage of working well with serial I/O programs (due to
expect) but the disadvantage of being yet another testing framework to learn and
the test model isn't very consistent when compared to JUnit.
PyUnit has the advantage of being shared with dogtail's test framework, being
similar to JUnit in its approach, but being an unknown when it comes to handling
serial I/O (and some people dislike python more then tcl :-)
How good is PyUnit at handling seerial I/O?
--
Summary: should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
Product: frysk
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: general
AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3784
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/3784] should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
2006-12-22 15:32 [Bug general/3784] New: should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit? cagney at redhat dot com
@ 2006-12-22 17:00 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2006-12-22 21:13 ` scox at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: cagney at redhat dot com @ 2006-12-22 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frysk-bugzilla
------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com 2006-12-22 17:00 -------
Please debate :-)
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3784
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/3784] should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
2006-12-22 15:32 [Bug general/3784] New: should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit? cagney at redhat dot com
2006-12-22 17:00 ` [Bug general/3784] " cagney at redhat dot com
@ 2006-12-22 21:13 ` scox at redhat dot com
2007-01-08 12:10 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2007-02-22 15:38 ` cagney at redhat dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: scox at redhat dot com @ 2006-12-22 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frysk-bugzilla
------- Additional Comments From scox at redhat dot com 2006-12-22 21:13 -------
or perhaps pexpect (http://pexpect.sourceforge.net/)
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3784
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/3784] should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
2006-12-22 15:32 [Bug general/3784] New: should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit? cagney at redhat dot com
2006-12-22 17:00 ` [Bug general/3784] " cagney at redhat dot com
2006-12-22 21:13 ` scox at redhat dot com
@ 2007-01-08 12:10 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2007-02-22 15:38 ` cagney at redhat dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: cagney at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-08 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frysk-bugzilla
------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com 2007-01-08 12:10 -------
Another option would be to set up a simple JUnit based framework.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3784
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/3784] should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
2006-12-22 15:32 [Bug general/3784] New: should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit? cagney at redhat dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-08 12:10 ` cagney at redhat dot com
@ 2007-02-22 15:38 ` cagney at redhat dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: cagney at redhat dot com @ 2007-02-22 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frysk-bugzilla
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|cagney at redhat dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3784
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-22 15:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-22 15:32 [Bug general/3784] New: should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit? cagney at redhat dot com
2006-12-22 17:00 ` [Bug general/3784] " cagney at redhat dot com
2006-12-22 21:13 ` scox at redhat dot com
2007-01-08 12:10 ` cagney at redhat dot com
2007-02-22 15:38 ` cagney at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).