public inbox for frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug general/3898] New: fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format
@ 2007-01-19 23:23 cagney at redhat dot com
2007-01-23 15:27 ` [Bug general/3898] " npremji at redhat dot com
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: cagney at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-19 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frysk-bugzilla
fstack and fhpd format their stack backtraces differently.
ex#1:
fstack: #0 0x556402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
fhpd: # 0 0xcd3402 in __kernel_vsyscall at #0
fstack is better, << at #0 >>, which is a non-existant line, shouldn't be included.
ex#2:
fstack: #5 0x81133e9 in _start () from: ../../stack.c#225
fhpd: # 5 0x81133e9 in _start at ../../stack.c#225
(ignoring that I strongly doubt that "_start" is in stack.c), their output
should be consistent.
Likely there should be a generic method, that when passed a stack backtrace
formats it to a writer.
--
Summary: fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format
Product: frysk
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: general
AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2244,2246
nThis:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Bug general/3898] fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format 2007-01-19 23:23 [Bug general/3898] New: fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format cagney at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-23 15:27 ` npremji at redhat dot com 2007-01-23 16:29 ` scox at redhat dot com 2007-01-23 21:56 ` npremji at redhat dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: npremji at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-23 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: frysk-bugzilla ------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com 2007-01-23 15:27 ------- Created an attachment (id=1517) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1517&action=view) Proposed patch for CLI to use same string that fstack uses. I don't know what to run to check the fhpd for backtrace format but I'm fairly sure this will work. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/3898] fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format 2007-01-19 23:23 [Bug general/3898] New: fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format cagney at redhat dot com 2007-01-23 15:27 ` [Bug general/3898] " npremji at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-23 16:29 ` scox at redhat dot com 2007-01-23 21:56 ` npremji at redhat dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: scox at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-23 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: frysk-bugzilla ------- Additional Comments From scox at redhat dot com 2007-01-23 16:29 ------- The fhpd 'where' request has been there quite a while, mostly out of necessity. I tried to style it after the hpd doc. Feel free to change it for the better as far as I am concerned. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug general/3898] fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format 2007-01-19 23:23 [Bug general/3898] New: fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format cagney at redhat dot com 2007-01-23 15:27 ` [Bug general/3898] " npremji at redhat dot com 2007-01-23 16:29 ` scox at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-23 21:56 ` npremji at redhat dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: npremji at redhat dot com @ 2007-01-23 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: frysk-bugzilla -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-23 21:56 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-01-19 23:23 [Bug general/3898] New: fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format cagney at redhat dot com 2007-01-23 15:27 ` [Bug general/3898] " npremji at redhat dot com 2007-01-23 16:29 ` scox at redhat dot com 2007-01-23 21:56 ` npremji at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).