[Bug general/3898] New: fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format

[Bug general/3898] New: fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format

[cagney at redhat dot com]

fstack and fhpd format their stack backtraces differently.

ex#1:
  fstack: #0 0x556402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
  fhpd: # 0 0xcd3402 in __kernel_vsyscall at #0
fstack is better, << at #0 >>, which is a non-existant line, shouldn't be included.

ex#2:
  fstack: #5 0x81133e9 in _start () from: ../../stack.c#225
  fhpd: # 5 0x81133e9 in _start at ../../stack.c#225
(ignoring that I strongly doubt that "_start" is in stack.c), their output
should be consistent.

Likely there should be a generic method, that when passed a stack backtrace
formats it to a writer.

-- 
           Summary: fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2244,2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug general/3898] fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format

[npremji at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-23 15:27 -------
Created an attachment (id=1517)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1517&action=view)
Proposed patch for CLI to use same string that fstack uses.

I don't know what to run to check the fhpd for backtrace format but I'm fairly
sure this will work.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug general/3898] fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format

[scox at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From scox at redhat dot com  2007-01-23 16:29 -------
The fhpd 'where' request has been there quite a while, mostly out of necessity.
 I tried to style it after the hpd doc.  Feel free to change it for the better
as far as I am concerned.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug general/3898] fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format

[npremji at redhat dot com]

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.