* more on powerpc-rtems failure
@ 1998-04-15 14:29 Joel Sherrill
1998-04-15 15:01 ` H.J. Lu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Sherrill @ 1998-04-15 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gas2
I got pinched today into producing a new toolset for someone and since
I have not resolved the 2.9 failure, I tried to revert to snapshots which
had not previously shown this problem. On another Redhat Linux x86
computer, I now get the same failure with both gas-980314 and gas-971208.
So this is not a recent thing which broke but I have build both of those
snapshots for every RTEMS configuration in the past so something has
changed.
Any more ideas on this?
Should I try upgrading to H.J.Lu's latest linux snapshot or the current
development snapshot?
I am baffled.
--joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: more on powerpc-rtems failure
1998-04-15 14:29 more on powerpc-rtems failure Joel Sherrill
@ 1998-04-15 15:01 ` H.J. Lu
1998-04-15 15:38 ` Joel Sherrill
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 1998-04-15 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Sherrill; +Cc: gas2
>
>
> I got pinched today into producing a new toolset for someone and since
> I have not resolved the 2.9 failure, I tried to revert to snapshots which
> had not previously shown this problem. On another Redhat Linux x86
> computer, I now get the same failure with both gas-980314 and gas-971208.
> So this is not a recent thing which broke but I have build both of those
> snapshots for every RTEMS configuration in the past so something has
> changed.
>
> Any more ideas on this?
>
> Should I try upgrading to H.J.Lu's latest linux snapshot or the current
> development snapshot?
>
I don't think it will help. However, I do have a few bug fixes which
I am testing now. I will submit them when they are stable enough.
BTW, if you can show the same bug for any Linux target, I will
fix it.
--
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: more on powerpc-rtems failure
1998-04-15 15:01 ` H.J. Lu
@ 1998-04-15 15:38 ` Joel Sherrill
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Sherrill @ 1998-04-15 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: gas2
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, H.J. Lu wrote:
> I am testing now. I will submit them when they are stable enough.
I have duplicated this with gas-980415.
This happens with both gcc-2.8.1 and egcs-1.0.2 as the gcc source tree.
> BTW, if you can show the same bug for any Linux target, I will
> fix it.
Generous offer but I can't. I just tried to configure for powerpc-linux
on a ix86-linux box and it made it through. <sigh>
I am going to try --disable-shared and let it build overnight while I am
gone. Nothing to lose. ;)
--joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1998-04-15 15:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1998-04-15 14:29 more on powerpc-rtems failure Joel Sherrill
1998-04-15 15:01 ` H.J. Lu
1998-04-15 15:38 ` Joel Sherrill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).