public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/11729] New: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
@ 2003-07-30 17:56 relf at os2 dot ru
  2003-07-30 19:13 ` [Bug libstdc++/11729] " paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 more replies)
  0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: relf at os2 dot ru @ 2003-07-30 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11729

           Summary: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: relf at os2 dot ru
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org

operator!= is missed for const_reverse_iterator (I've tried `map' and `multimap'
classes). Compiling the code below produces an error:

bug_ne.cpp: In function `int main()':
bug_ne.cpp:12: error: no match for 'operator!=' in 'ri != std::map<_Key, _Tp,
   _Compare, _Alloc>::rend() [with _Key = int, _Tp = int, _Compare =
   std::less<int>, _Alloc = std::allocator<std::pair<const int, int> >]()'


///// cut_here //////
#include <map>
#include <iostream>
 
using namespace std;
 
typedef map<int,int> M;
 
int main() {
    M m;
    m[0] = 0;
 
    for(M::const_reverse_iterator ri=m.rbegin();ri!=m.rend();++ri)
        cout << ri->first << " : " << ri->second << endl;
 
    return 0;
}
///// cut_here //////


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/11729] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
  2003-07-30 17:56 [Bug c++/11729] New: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator relf at os2 dot ru
@ 2003-07-30 19:13 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-01-02  5:05 ` [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR179] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-07-30 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11729


paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
          Component|c++                         |libstdc++
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


------- Additional Comments From paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-07-30 19:13 -------
Know behaviour, issue DR280 ("Comparison of reverse_iterator to const
reverse_iterator") of the ISO Standard, which, however, at variance with the 
corresponding DR179 about iterators, is still in the 'Open' status: we can't do
anything about it 'til the official resolution.

Thanks for your report, Paolo.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR179] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
  2003-07-30 17:56 [Bug c++/11729] New: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator relf at os2 dot ru
  2003-07-30 19:13 ` [Bug libstdc++/11729] " paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-02  5:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-01-06 10:12 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-02  5:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-02 05:05 -------
Paolo did DR179, ever get resolved, if not can you reopen the bug and suspend it while the DR is 
open.

Thanks,
Andrew

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
            Summary|no operator!= for           |[DR179] no operator!= for
                   |const_reverse_iterator      |const_reverse_iterator


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11729


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR179] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
  2003-07-30 17:56 [Bug c++/11729] New: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator relf at os2 dot ru
  2003-07-30 19:13 ` [Bug libstdc++/11729] " paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-01-02  5:05 ` [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR179] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-06 10:12 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-01-09 10:43 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-06 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-06 10:12 -------
*** Bug 13581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |papadopo at shfj dot cea dot
                   |                            |fr


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11729


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR179] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
  2003-07-30 17:56 [Bug c++/11729] New: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator relf at os2 dot ru
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-01-06 10:12 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-09 10:43 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-03-05  7:28 ` relf at os2 dot ru
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-09 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-09 10:43 -------
*** Bug 13627 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |wanderer at rsu dot ru


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11729


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR179] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
  2003-07-30 17:56 [Bug c++/11729] New: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator relf at os2 dot ru
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-01-09 10:43 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-05  7:28 ` relf at os2 dot ru
  2004-03-05  7:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: relf at os2 dot ru @ 2004-03-05  7:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From relf at os2 dot ru  2004-03-05 07:28 -------
I think that INVALID resolution is not suitable. In particular, it hides the
bugreport from default searching.
Reopen to mark it SUSPENDED...

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11729


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR179] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
  2003-07-30 17:56 [Bug c++/11729] New: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator relf at os2 dot ru
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-03-05  7:28 ` relf at os2 dot ru
@ 2004-03-05  7:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-03-05  7:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-05  7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-03-05 07:31 -------
Confirming it to ...

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-03-05 07:31:43
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11729


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR179] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
  2003-07-30 17:56 [Bug c++/11729] New: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator relf at os2 dot ru
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-03-05  7:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-05  7:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-03-05  7:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-05  7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-03-05 07:32 -------
Suspend it.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |SUSPENDED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11729


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR179] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
  2003-07-30 17:56 [Bug c++/11729] New: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator relf at os2 dot ru
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-03-05  7:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-05  7:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-03-22  6:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR280] " kenta at mit dot edu
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-05  7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.4.0                       |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11729


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR280] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
  2003-07-30 17:56 [Bug c++/11729] New: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator relf at os2 dot ru
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-03-05  7:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-22  6:57 ` kenta at mit dot edu
  2004-03-22  8:08 ` kenta at mit dot edu
  2005-01-21 11:34 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: kenta at mit dot edu @ 2004-03-22  6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From kenta at mit dot edu  2004-03-22 06:56 -------
DR279 is a "Closed Issue" now, according to 
http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#279

DR280 is still active, but "implementation experience" is sought:

http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#280

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11729


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR280] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
  2003-07-30 17:56 [Bug c++/11729] New: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator relf at os2 dot ru
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-03-22  6:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR280] " kenta at mit dot edu
@ 2004-03-22  8:08 ` kenta at mit dot edu
  2005-01-21 11:34 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: kenta at mit dot edu @ 2004-03-22  8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From kenta at mit dot edu  2004-03-22 08:08 -------
Oops, DR279 is irrelevant.  I had read 279 instead of 179.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11729


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR280] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator
  2003-07-30 17:56 [Bug c++/11729] New: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator relf at os2 dot ru
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-03-22  8:08 ` kenta at mit dot edu
@ 2005-01-21 11:34 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2005-01-21 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2005-01-21 11:34 -------
*** Bug 19562 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kunert at physik dot tu-
                   |                            |dresden dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11729


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-21 11:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-30 17:56 [Bug c++/11729] New: no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator relf at os2 dot ru
2003-07-30 19:13 ` [Bug libstdc++/11729] " paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-02  5:05 ` [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR179] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-06 10:12 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-09 10:43 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-05  7:28 ` relf at os2 dot ru
2004-03-05  7:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-05  7:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-05  7:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-22  6:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR280] " kenta at mit dot edu
2004-03-22  8:08 ` kenta at mit dot edu
2005-01-21 11:34 ` pcarlini at suse dot de

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).