[Bug fortran/100025] New: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

[Bug fortran/100025] New: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

[jrfsousa at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025

            Bug ID: 100025
           Summary: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 50552
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50552&action=edit
Fortran code showing problem

Hi All!

ICE on assumed-rank subroutine call with missing explicit interface.

Tested on:

GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.0.1 20210410 (experimental)
GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210410

Does not ICE on:

GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210410

Thank you very much.

Best regards,
José Rui

[Bug fortran/100025] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

[jrfsousa at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025

--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa <jrfsousa at gmail dot com> ---
Patch posted:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055921.html

[Bug fortran/100025] [10/11 Regression] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P4
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=100024
      Known to work|                            |9.3.1
      Known to fail|                            |10.3.1, 11.0
            Summary|ICE on subroutine missing   |[10/11 Regression] ICE on
                   |explicit interface          |subroutine missing explicit
                   |                            |interface
   Target Milestone|---                         |10.4
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-invalid-code
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-04-14
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Confirmed.

[Bug fortran/100025] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|10.4                        |10.5

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.

[Bug fortran/100025] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

[anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The basic issue seems to have been fixed by the patch for PR103287,
and the present patch would collide with that one.

Marking as fixed & duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 103287 ***