public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/100025] New: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface @ 2021-04-10 20:59 jrfsousa at gmail dot com 2021-04-11 0:35 ` [Bug fortran/100025] " jrfsousa at gmail dot com ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jrfsousa at gmail dot com @ 2021-04-10 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025 Bug ID: 100025 Summary: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jrfsousa at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50552 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50552&action=edit Fortran code showing problem Hi All! ICE on assumed-rank subroutine call with missing explicit interface. Tested on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.0.1 20210410 (experimental) GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210410 Does not ICE on: GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.3.1 20210410 Thank you very much. Best regards, José Rui ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/100025] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface 2021-04-10 20:59 [Bug fortran/100025] New: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface jrfsousa at gmail dot com @ 2021-04-11 0:35 ` jrfsousa at gmail dot com 2021-04-14 18:19 ` [Bug fortran/100025] [10/11 Regression] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jrfsousa at gmail dot com @ 2021-04-11 0:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa <jrfsousa at gmail dot com> --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055921.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/100025] [10/11 Regression] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface 2021-04-10 20:59 [Bug fortran/100025] New: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface jrfsousa at gmail dot com 2021-04-11 0:35 ` [Bug fortran/100025] " jrfsousa at gmail dot com @ 2021-04-14 18:19 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2022-06-28 10:44 ` [Bug fortran/100025] [10/11/12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-16 20:12 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2021-04-14 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025 Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P4 See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=100024 Known to work| |9.3.1 Known to fail| |10.3.1, 11.0 Summary|ICE on subroutine missing |[10/11 Regression] ICE on |explicit interface |subroutine missing explicit | |interface Target Milestone|--- |10.4 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords| |ice-on-invalid-code Last reconfirmed| |2021-04-14 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- Confirmed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/100025] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface 2021-04-10 20:59 [Bug fortran/100025] New: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface jrfsousa at gmail dot com 2021-04-11 0:35 ` [Bug fortran/100025] " jrfsousa at gmail dot com 2021-04-14 18:19 ` [Bug fortran/100025] [10/11 Regression] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2022-06-28 10:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-16 20:12 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/100025] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface 2021-04-10 20:59 [Bug fortran/100025] New: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface jrfsousa at gmail dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2022-06-28 10:44 ` [Bug fortran/100025] [10/11/12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-09-16 20:12 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-09-16 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The basic issue seems to have been fixed by the patch for PR103287, and the present patch would collide with that one. Marking as fixed & duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 103287 *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-16 20:12 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-04-10 20:59 [Bug fortran/100025] New: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface jrfsousa at gmail dot com 2021-04-11 0:35 ` [Bug fortran/100025] " jrfsousa at gmail dot com 2021-04-14 18:19 ` [Bug fortran/100025] [10/11 Regression] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2022-06-28 10:44 ` [Bug fortran/100025] [10/11/12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-16 20:12 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).