public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
@ 2021-06-07 20:21 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 0:40 ` [Bug target/100952] " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (19 more replies)
0 siblings, 20 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-07 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
Bug ID: 100952
Summary: [12 regression] several test case failures after
r12-1202
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
previous run: g:a3f6bd7891495a0ed65f7da7a55d36c730328692, r12-1201: 240
failures
this run : g:9080a3bf23297885fdc47221da37a71d6dec93c5, r12-1202: 252
failures
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fusion-p10-ldcmpi.c scan-assembler-times
lbz_cmpldi_cr0_QI_clobber_CCUNS_zero 2
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fusion-p10-ldcmpi.c scan-assembler-times
lha_cmpdi_cr0_HI_clobber_CC_sign 8
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fusion-p10-ldcmpi.c scan-assembler-times
lhz_cmpldi_cr0_HI_clobber_CCUNS_zero 2
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fusion-p10-ldcmpi.c scan-assembler-times
lwa_cmpdi_cr0_SI_EXTSI_CC_sign 3
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fusion-p10-ldcmpi.c scan-assembler-times
lwz_cmpldi_cr0_SI_EXTSI_CCUNS_zero 2
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c scan-rtl-dump-times combine "\\(compare:CC
\\((?:and|zero_extend):DI \\(reg:[SD]I" 1
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr81348.c scan-assembler \\mlxsihzx\\M
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr81348.c scan-assembler \\mvextsh2d\\M
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c scan-assembler-times \\mlwz\\M 2
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c scan-assembler-times \\mplwz\\M 2
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c scan-assembler-times \\mpstw\\M 2
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c scan-assembler-times \\mstw\\M 2
I am seeing these on both BE and LE and on all levels of powerp64 hardware.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-08 0:40 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 5:14 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-08 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also, this test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90 -O0 execution test
only fails on power 10.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 0:40 ` [Bug target/100952] " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-08 5:14 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 6:09 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-08 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #2 from HaoChen Gui <guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For pr81348.c, the lxsihzx and vextsh2d are no long needed as the HI to DI mode
promotion is removed by my patch. The short could be loaded directly.
addis 9,2,.LANCHOR0+4@toc@ha
lha 9,.LANCHOR0+4@toc@l(9)
I plan to change the match instructions for this case.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 0:40 ` [Bug target/100952] " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 5:14 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-08 6:09 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 7:02 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-08 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #3 from HaoChen Gui <guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For pr56605.c, the pseudo is not taken mode promotion. The original combined
insn
compare:CC (and:DI (reg:DI 206)
changes to
compare:CC (and:SI (subreg:SI (reg:DI 206) 0)
So the dump scan fails. I will changed the case.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-08 6:09 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-08 7:02 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 7:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-08 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #4 from HaoChen Gui <guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For fusion-p10-ldcmpi.c and prefix-no-update.c, the optimization doesn't work
when mode promotion is disabled. I will do further investigation.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-08 7:02 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-08 7:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-24 20:39 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-08 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-08 7:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-24 20:39 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-25 6:11 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-24 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 101201 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-24 20:39 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-25 6:11 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-25 6:12 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-25 6:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #6 from HaoChen Gui <guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Seurer,
Could you provide detail info about test? Such as config and build option. I
tested the build on P10 and no failure on parity_1.f90. Thanks.
PASS: gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-25 6:11 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-25 6:12 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-25 17:59 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-25 6:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #7 from HaoChen Gui <guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
PASS: gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90 -O0 execution test
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-25 6:12 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-25 17:59 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-23 2:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-25 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I just tried with current trunk:
g:e0672017370b9a9362fda52ecffe33d1c9c41829, r12-1813
make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/parity_1.f90 -O0 execution test
# of expected passes 11
# of unexpected failures 1
My configure is pretty simple:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/configure
--prefix=/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++
--with-cpu=power10 --disable-bootstrap
--with-as=/home/seurer/binutils/install/bin/as
--with-ld=/home/seurer/binutils/install/bin/ld
--with-ar=/home/seurer/binutils/install/bin/ar
The --with-XX things are to pick up the 2.36.1 version of binutils which is
also on my path.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-25 17:59 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-23 2:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-29 7:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-23 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui <guihaoc@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3382846558e02044598556e66e5ea1cb3115429d
commit r12-2479-g3382846558e02044598556e66e5ea1cb3115429d
Author: Haochen Gui <guihaoc@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Fri Jul 23 09:47:23 2021 +0800
Fix execution failure of parity_1.f90 on P10 [PR100952]
gcc/
PR target/100952
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (cstore<mode>4): Fix wrong fall through.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-23 2:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-29 7:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-02 3:14 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-29 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui <guihaoc@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0529d96f56758e56151f409c55bab3034163210
commit r12-2592-gf0529d96f56758e56151f409c55bab3034163210
Author: Haochen Gui <guihaoc@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Thu Jul 29 14:56:12 2021 +0800
Fix failed test cases caused by disabling mode promotion for pseudos
[PR100952]
gcc/testsuite
PR target/100952
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c: Change matching
conditions.
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr81348.c: Likewise.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-29 7:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-02 3:14 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-30 10:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-02 3:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui
<guihaoc@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:960135b264a7724cf9c56acb6d85fb2d842a36e2
commit r11-8824-g960135b264a7724cf9c56acb6d85fb2d842a36e2
Author: Haochen Gui <guihaoc@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Mon Aug 2 11:14:15 2021 +0800
Fix execution failure of parity_1.f90 on P10 [PR100952]
gcc/
PR target/100952
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (cstore<mode>4): Fix wrong fall through.
(cherry picked from commit 3382846558e02044598556e66e5ea1cb3115429d)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2021-08-02 3:14 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-30 10:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-20 6:37 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-30 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool
<segher@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c27080718d480ef08986b9224c0d146b75791c25
commit r11-8941-gc27080718d480ef08986b9224c0d146b75791c25
Author: Haochen Gui <guihaoc@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Thu Jul 29 14:56:12 2021 +0800
Fix failed test cases caused by disabling mode promotion for pseudos
[PR100952]
gcc/testsuite
PR target/100952
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c: Change matching
conditions.
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr81348.c: Likewise.
(cherry picked from commit f0529d96f56758e56151f409c55bab3034163210)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2021-08-30 10:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-20 6:37 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-14 18:37 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-20 6:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #13 from HaoChen Gui <guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Issue for fusion-p10-ldcmpi.c was fixed by r12-1655.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2021-June/349357.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2021-12-20 6:37 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-14 18:37 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-14 18:48 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-14 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Which tests are still failing?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-14 18:37 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-14 18:48 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-17 5:55 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-14 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #15 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looking through test results I see that gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c and
gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c are still failing today.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-14 18:48 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-17 5:55 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-06 8:30 ` [Bug target/100952] [12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-17 5:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #16 from HaoChen Gui <guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
prefix-no-update.c should be fixed by the patch Segher proposed in PR103197.
pr56605.c got a wrong fixed and failed with GCC11. I will submit a patch to fix
it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12/13 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-17 5:55 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-06 8:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-26 13:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-20 3:02 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-06 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|12.0 |12.2
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 12.1 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 12.2.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12/13 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-06 8:30 ` [Bug target/100952] [12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-07-26 13:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-20 3:02 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-07-26 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/100952] [12/13 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-26 13:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-12-20 3:02 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-20 3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
HaoChen Gui <guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #19 from HaoChen Gui <guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Closing as fixed then (pr56605.c still fails on older branches, but that is
harmless). Other issues are all fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-20 3:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-07 20:21 [Bug target/100952] New: [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 0:40 ` [Bug target/100952] " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 5:14 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 6:09 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 7:02 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 7:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-24 20:39 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-25 6:11 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-25 6:12 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-25 17:59 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-23 2:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-29 7:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-02 3:14 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-30 10:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-20 6:37 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-14 18:37 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-14 18:48 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-17 5:55 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-06 8:30 ` [Bug target/100952] [12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-26 13:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-20 3:02 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).