public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/101047] New: Pointer explicit initialization fails
@ 2021-06-13 11:06 jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-13 16:04 ` [Bug fortran/101047] " jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-13 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101047

            Bug ID: 101047
           Summary: Pointer explicit initialization fails
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 50991
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50991&action=edit
Fortran code showing problem

Hi all!

Pointer explicit initialization does not seem to work at all.

Seen on:

GNU Fortran (GCC) 9.4.1 20210605
GNU Fortran (GCC) 10.3.1 20210605
GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.1.1 20210605
GNU Fortran (GCC) 12.0.0 20210612 (experimental)

Thank you very much.

Best regards,
José Rui

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/101047] Pointer explicit initialization fails
  2021-06-13 11:06 [Bug fortran/101047] New: Pointer explicit initialization fails jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-13 16:04 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-13 16:05 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-13 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101047

--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa <jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Patch posted:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056152.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/101047] Pointer explicit initialization fails
  2021-06-13 11:06 [Bug fortran/101047] New: Pointer explicit initialization fails jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-13 16:04 ` [Bug fortran/101047] " jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-13 16:05 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-03-31  2:25 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-03-31  7:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-13 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101047

--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa <jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 50994
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50994&action=edit
Patch and changelog

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/101047] Pointer explicit initialization fails
  2021-06-13 11:06 [Bug fortran/101047] New: Pointer explicit initialization fails jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-13 16:04 ` [Bug fortran/101047] " jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-13 16:05 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-03-31  2:25 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-03-31  7:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-03-31  2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101047

Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Did we let this fall in a crack or was there some other holdup?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/101047] Pointer explicit initialization fails
  2021-06-13 11:06 [Bug fortran/101047] New: Pointer explicit initialization fails jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-03-31  2:25 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-03-31  7:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-03-31  7:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101047

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-03-31
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
                 CC|                            |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3)
> Did we let this fall in a crack or was there some other holdup?

I cannot speak for anybody else but it came up during my long break from
gfortran support and so I certainly missed it.

I feel that this is sufficiently obtrusive that it will have to wait for 14.0.0
to open. That said, I have put it on my TODO list to review.

I discovered that pointer initialization is an issue just yesterday after
taking a peek at recent posts by Peter Klausler on clf.

Paul

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-31  7:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-13 11:06 [Bug fortran/101047] New: Pointer explicit initialization fails jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-13 16:04 ` [Bug fortran/101047] " jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-13 16:05 ` jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31  2:25 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31  7:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).