public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102586] [12 Regression] ICE in clear_padding_type, at gimple-fold.c:4798 since r12-3433-ga25e0b5e6ac8a77a Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 22:34:51 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-102586-4-YjcLE2sYuP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-102586-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102586 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- With the C7/C8 case, it is actually not just about clearing too much, but clearing different bits: struct C0 {}; struct C1 {}; struct C2 : C1, virtual C0 {}; struct C3 : virtual C2, C1 {}; struct C6 { char c; }; struct C7 : virtual C6, virtual C3, C1 {}; struct C8 : C7 {}; __attribute__((noipa)) void foo (C8 *q) { __builtin_clear_padding (q); } __attribute__((noipa)) void bar (C7 *q) { __builtin_clear_padding (q); } void baz () { C8 c8; foo (&c8); bar (&c8); } will clear in one case the padding byte at offset 8, in the other case will keep that unchanged and will clear the byte after it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-10 22:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-10-04 7:30 [Bug tree-optimization/102586] New: " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-04 7:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102586] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-04 8:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-04 8:22 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-04 11:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-04 12:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-15 13:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-15 13:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-17 13:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-09 17:21 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 14:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 14:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 15:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 15:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 15:56 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 18:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 18:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 19:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 22:07 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 22:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 22:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 22:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-02-11 1:47 ` rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-11 12:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-11 15:29 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-11 16:23 ` qing.zhao at oracle dot com 2022-02-11 16:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-11 17:36 ` qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-11 17:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-11 21:52 ` qing.zhao at oracle dot com 2022-03-12 4:40 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-14 9:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-07 7:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-07 7:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-102586-4-YjcLE2sYuP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).