public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/103226] [12 Regression] Recent change to copy-headers causes execution failure for gcc.dg/torture/pr80974
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 07:10:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-103226-4-TzUl7qwAtl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-103226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103226

Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P1                          |P4

--- Comment #20 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Your c#19 was a bit hard to follow.  But you hit the key issue.  Namely that
the doloop pattern will set/clobber the condition codes if it gets split. 
Failure to show that clobber means that IRA/LRA have incorrect dataflow and
make incorrect decisions.

I'm testing the obvious fix of adding the clobber.  It may be possible to
improve on my patch, but I'll leave that to someone who really cares about the
port.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-20  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-13 20:39 [Bug tree-optimization/103226] New: " law at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-14 10:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103226] " aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-15  9:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-16  2:30 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 11:14 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 11:32 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 15:00 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 15:02 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 15:53 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 16:09 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 16:28 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 16:29 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 16:31 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 17:18 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 17:54 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 18:31 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 18:43 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 19:26 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-17 20:02 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-18 13:28 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-20  7:10 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-11-20  7:23 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-20 16:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-20 16:31 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-02 14:55 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-103226-4-TzUl7qwAtl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).