public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/103465] Invalid note with -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 13:39:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-103465-4-v4LKperQpg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-103465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103465
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> However, still talking about the current master only, I see a difference
> with -O3, when I try on the repro example from Bug 103274 and -O3:
>
> x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -c -S -O3 -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition a.c -o
> nropt.s
>
> x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -c -S -O3 -freorder-blocks-and-partition a.c -o ropt.s
> x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -c -S -O3 a.c -o noopt.s
>
> All of these assembler files are different (and from my non-expert reading,
> noopt.s uses the optimization and does have the invalid unwind information
> as reported in Bug 103274). Is the optimization correctly dropped also with
> -O3 only?
Hmmm, I've just tested the same with the locally built cross-compiler:
~/Programming/gcc/configure --enable-languages=c,c++
--prefix=/home/marxin/bin/gcc --disable-multilib --enable-host-shared
--disable-libsanitizer --enable-valgrind-annotations --disable-bootstrap
--target=x86_64-w64-mingw32
and it works fine, all 3 assembly files are identical.
cat 1.s
.file "pr103274.c"
.text
.section .rdata,"dr"
.LC0:
.ascii "factor\0"
.text
.p2align 4
.globl _Z5dummyP7SEXPREC
.def _Z5dummyP7SEXPREC; .scl 2; .type 32; .endef
.seh_proc _Z5dummyP7SEXPREC
_Z5dummyP7SEXPREC:
.LFB2:
pushq %r13
.seh_pushreg %r13
pushq %r12
.seh_pushreg %r12
pushq %rbp
.seh_pushreg %rbp
pushq %rdi
.seh_pushreg %rdi
pushq %rsi
.seh_pushreg %rsi
pushq %rbx
.seh_pushreg %rbx
subq $40, %rsp
.seh_stackalloc 40
.seh_endprologue
movq %rcx, %r12
call _Z11mypredicateP7SEXPREC
testl %eax, %eax
jne .L21
.L2:
movq .refptr.R_NilValue(%rip), %rax
movq (%rax), %rax
addq $40, %rsp
popq %rbx
popq %rsi
popq %rdi
popq %rbp
popq %r12
popq %r13
ret
.p2align 4,,10
.p2align 3
.L21:
movq %r12, %rcx
call _Z11mygetattribP7SEXPREC
movq %rax, %rcx
movq %rax, %r13
call _Z8mylengthP7SEXPREC
movl %eax, %ebp
testl %eax, %eax
jle .L2
movl %eax, %r12d
movl $1, %esi
leaq .LC0(%rip), %rdi
jmp .L6
.p2align 4,,10
.p2align 3
.L8:
movq %rax, %rsi
.L6:
movzbl 0(%r13), %ebx
andl $1, %ebx
je .L3
leal -1(%rsi), %edx
movq %r13, %rcx
call _Z11myaltstringP7SEXPRECi
movq %rdi, %rdx
movq %rax, %rcx
addq $8, %rcx
call _Z6strcmpPKcS0_
testl %eax, %eax
je .L5
.L22:
cmpq %r12, %rsi
je .L2
leaq 1(%rsi), %rax
testb %bl, %bl
jne .L8
movslq %esi, %rsi
.L7:
movq 8(%r13,%rsi,8), %rax
movq %rdi, %rdx
leaq 8(%rax), %rcx
call _Z6strcmpPKcS0_
testl %eax, %eax
je .L5
addq $1, %rsi
cmpl %esi, %ebp
jg .L7
jmp .L2
.p2align 4,,10
.p2align 3
.L3:
movq 0(%r13,%rsi,8), %rcx
movq %rdi, %rdx
addq $8, %rcx
call _Z6strcmpPKcS0_
testl %eax, %eax
jne .L22
.L5:
call _Z11myerrorcallv
nop
.seh_endproc
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 12.0.0 20211209 (experimental)"
.def _Z11mypredicateP7SEXPREC; .scl 2; .type 32;
.endef
.def _Z11mygetattribP7SEXPREC; .scl 2; .type 32;
.endef
.def _Z8mylengthP7SEXPREC; .scl 2; .type 32; .endef
.def _Z11myaltstringP7SEXPRECi; .scl 2; .type 32;
.endef
.def _Z6strcmpPKcS0_; .scl 2; .type 32; .endef
.def _Z11myerrorcallv; .scl 2; .type 32; .endef
.section .rdata$.refptr.R_NilValue, "dr"
.globl .refptr.R_NilValue
.linkonce discard
.refptr.R_NilValue:
.quad R_NilValue
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-09 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-29 10:00 [Bug rtl-optimization/103465] New: " tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2021-11-29 10:12 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/103465] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-29 10:17 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2021-11-29 10:18 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-29 13:23 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-29 15:25 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2021-12-09 13:39 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-12-09 13:40 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-09 14:37 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2021-12-09 14:41 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2021-12-09 14:44 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2021-12-09 15:24 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2021-12-09 15:28 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-09 15:44 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-09 15:53 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2021-12-09 15:55 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2021-12-09 19:29 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-28 10:05 ` [Bug driver/103465] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-28 10:06 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 7:32 ` [Bug driver/103465] [12 regression] -freorder-blocks-and-partition broken on 64-bit Windows ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 9:51 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 11:42 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 12:47 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 13:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 13:50 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 14:07 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2022-01-06 17:17 ` [Bug target/103465] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 22:18 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2022-01-07 9:50 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2022-01-07 17:33 ` tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
2022-01-10 11:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-10 16:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-10 16:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-10 16:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-10 16:09 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-103465-4-v4LKperQpg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).