public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/105394] [12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed with MVE during GIMPLE pass: veclower2 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 09:07:54 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-105394-4-baXWejW3vf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-105394-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105394 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I think the fix should rather be to the else aa = tree_vec_extract (gsi, cond_type, a, width, index); part which assumes that if a is not a comparison or a integer mode mask then the mask vector element width is the same as the data element width which isn't the case for VnBImode vectors (neither on MVE which can have multi-bit bitsize BImode elements nor on SVE/GCN which I think have one-bit bitsize BImode elements only).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-29 9:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-04-26 12:23 [Bug tree-optimization/105394] New: [12 " acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-26 12:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/105394] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-26 12:42 ` acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-26 13:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-26 13:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-26 13:22 ` [Bug target/105394] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-29 9:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-04-29 9:20 ` [Bug target/105394] [12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-29 9:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-29 9:59 ` acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-03 8:34 ` acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-03 8:49 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2022-05-03 9:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-03 9:25 ` [Bug target/105394] [12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-06 8:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-06 9:27 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-06 9:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-105394-4-baXWejW3vf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).