public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106293] [13 regression] 456.hmmer at -Ofast -march=native regressed by 19% on zen2 and zen3 in July 2022 Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 10:09:30 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-106293-4-ZhoHbY4Duf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-106293-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106293 Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[13/14 Regression] |[13 regression] 456.hmmer |456.hmmer at -Ofast |at -Ofast -march=native |-march=native regressed by |regressed by 19% on zen2 |19% on zen2 and zen3 in |and zen3 in July 2022 |July 2022 | --- Comment #26 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- We are out of regression finally, but still there are several things to fix. 1) vectorizer produces corrupt profile 2) loop-split is not able to work out that it splits last iteration 3) we work way to hard optimizing loops iterating 0 times. The loop in question really iterates zero times. It is created by loop split from the internal loop: for (k = 1; k <= M; k++) { mc[k] = mpp[k-1] + tpmm[k-1]; if ((sc = ip[k-1] + tpim[k-1]) > mc[k]) mc[k] = sc; if ((sc = dpp[k-1] + tpdm[k-1]) > mc[k]) mc[k] = sc; if ((sc = xmb + bp[k]) > mc[k]) mc[k] = sc; mc[k] += ms[k]; if (mc[k] < -INFTY) mc[k] = -INFTY; dc[k] = dc[k-1] + tpdd[k-1]; if ((sc = mc[k-1] + tpmd[k-1]) > dc[k]) dc[k] = sc; if (dc[k] < -INFTY) dc[k] = -INFTY; if (k < M) { ic[k] = mpp[k] + tpmi[k]; if ((sc = ip[k] + tpii[k]) > ic[k]) ic[k] = sc; ic[k] += is[k]; if (ic[k] < -INFTY) ic[k] = -INFTY; } it peels off the last iteration. For ocnidtion is if (k <= M) while we plit on if (k < M) M is varianble and nothing seems to be able to optimize out the second loop after splitting. My plan is to add the pattern match so loop split gets this right and records upper bound on iteration count, but first want to show other bugs exposed by this scenario.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-04 10:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-07-14 9:08 [Bug tree-optimization/106293] New: " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-14 9:22 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106293] [13 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-14 12:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-14 12:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-25 9:44 ` luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-25 9:46 ` luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-10 12:12 ` yann at ywg dot ch 2023-01-10 12:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-10 15:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-10 15:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-11 7:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-17 15:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106293] [13/14 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-17 16:15 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-26 6:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-27 9:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-27 18:01 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-27 21:38 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-28 7:22 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-07-28 8:01 ` Jan Hubicka 2023-07-28 7:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-28 8:01 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-07-28 12:09 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-07-31 7:44 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-31 15:39 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-01 10:40 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-02 8:48 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-02 9:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-04 10:09 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-08-07 8:56 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106293] [13 regression] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-10 16:01 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-21 9:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-106293-4-ZhoHbY4Duf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).