public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "valera.mironow at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/106772] New: atomic<T>::wait shouldn't touch waiter pool if used platform wait
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:38:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-106772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106772

            Bug ID: 106772
           Summary: atomic<T>::wait shouldn't touch waiter pool if used
                    platform wait
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: valera.mironow at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

atomic<T>::wait shouldn't touch waiter pool if used platform wait.

Because otherwise it affected by waiter pool bugs.
And performance can degrade on machine with many cores, because waiter pool
have only 16 cells.
Also it makes fetch_add with seq_cst, that can hide synchronization issue

             reply	other threads:[~2022-08-29 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-29 12:38 valera.mironow at gmail dot com [this message]
2022-08-29 12:40 ` [Bug libstdc++/106772] " valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-08-29 15:12 ` rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-20  3:38 ` rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-20  7:39 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-20  7:47 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-20 14:14 ` rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-20 14:20 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-20 14:23 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-20 14:27 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-20 14:36 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-20 14:40 ` rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-20 14:54 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-20 15:45 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-20 15:55 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-20 16:00 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-20 16:05 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-28 21:54 ` rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 22:00 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-28 22:04 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-28 22:18 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-28 22:34 ` rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 22:50 ` rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 23:09 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-28 23:25 ` valera.mironow at gmail dot com
2022-09-28 23:40 ` rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-106772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).