public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/106875] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343
@ 2022-09-07 17:17 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-09-07 19:39 ` [Bug c++/106875] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: gscfq@t-online.de @ 2022-09-07 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
Bug ID: 106875
Summary: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in
ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at
config/i386/i386.cc:8343
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gscfq@t-online.de
Target Milestone: ---
Started between 20211114 and 20211121, at -O0,
with file g++.target/i386/pr101180.C :
$ g++-13-20220904 -c pr101180.C -O0 -mabi=ms -fabi-version=3
-mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues
during RTL pass: pro_and_epilogue
pr101180.C: In function 'void f(T, FromT) [with T = A<float>; FromT = int]':
pr101180.C:19:1: internal compiler error: in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save,
at config/i386/i386.cc:8343
19 | }
| ^
0x116e58a ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save
../../gcc/config/i386/i386.cc:8343
0x1184d2c ix86_expand_prologue()
../../gcc/config/i386/i386.cc:8919
0x162266a gen_prologue()
../../gcc/config/i386/i386.md:16194
0x11749c8 target_gen_prologue
../../gcc/config/i386/i386.md:23608
0xb77279 make_prologue_seq
../../gcc/function.cc:5826
0xb77454 thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns()
../../gcc/function.cc:6058
0xb77a32 rest_of_handle_thread_prologue_and_epilogue
../../gcc/function.cc:6549
0xb77a32 execute
../../gcc/function.cc:6625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/106875] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd
2022-09-07 17:17 [Bug c++/106875] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 gscfq@t-online.de
@ 2022-09-07 19:39 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-08 1:44 ` [Bug target/106875] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-09-07 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2022-09-07
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |[11/12/13 Regression] ICE
|in |in
|ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_ |ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_
|save, at |save, at
|config/i386/i386.cc:8343 |config/i386/i386.cc:8343
| |since
| |r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/106875] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd
2022-09-07 17:17 [Bug c++/106875] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-09-07 19:39 ` [Bug c++/106875] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-09-08 1:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-19 6:02 ` [Bug target/106875] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save with -mabi=ms -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and "#pragma GCC target" " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-09-08 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/106875] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save with -mabi=ms -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and "#pragma GCC target" since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd
2022-09-07 17:17 [Bug c++/106875] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-09-07 19:39 ` [Bug c++/106875] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-08 1:44 ` [Bug target/106875] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-10-19 6:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-25 16:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-10-19 6:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/106875] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save with -mabi=ms -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and "#pragma GCC target" since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd
2022-09-07 17:17 [Bug c++/106875] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 gscfq@t-online.de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-10-19 6:02 ` [Bug target/106875] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save with -mabi=ms -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and "#pragma GCC target" " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-25 16:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-28 9:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-25 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 53965
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53965&action=edit
gcc13-pr106875.patch
Untested fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/106875] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save with -mabi=ms -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and "#pragma GCC target" since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd
2022-09-07 17:17 [Bug c++/106875] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 gscfq@t-online.de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-25 16:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-28 9:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-28 9:22 ` [Bug target/106875] [11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-28 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee629d242d9f93a38e49bed904bb334bbe15dde1
commit r13-4353-gee629d242d9f93a38e49bed904bb334bbe15dde1
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Nov 28 10:13:43 2022 +0100
i386: Fix up ix86_abi handling [PR106875]
The following testcase fails since my changes to make also
opts_set saved/restored upon function target/optimization changes
(before it has been acting as "has this option be ever explicit
anywhere?").
The problem is that for ix86_abi we depend on the opts_set
value for it in ix86_option_override_internal:
SET_OPTION_IF_UNSET (opts, opts_set, ix86_abi, DEFAULT_ABI);
but as it is a TargetSave, the backend code is required to
save/restore it manually (it does that) and since gcc 11 also
to save/restore the opts_set bit for it (which isn't done).
We don't do that for various other TargetSave which
ix86_function_specific_{save,restore} saves/restores, but as long
as we never test opts_set for it, it doesn't really matter.
One possible fix would be to introduce some new TargetSave into
which ix86_function_specific_{save,restore} would save/restore a bitmask
of the opts_set bits. The following patch uses an easier fix, by
making it a TargetVariable instead the saving/restoring is handled
by the generated code.
The differences in options.h are just slight movements on where
*ix86_abi stuff appears in it, ditto for options.cc, the real
differences are just in options-save.cc, where cl_target_option_save
gets:
+ ptr->x_ix86_abi = opts->x_ix86_abi;
...
+ if (opts_set->x_ix86_abi) mask |= HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << 3;
(plus adjustments of following TargetVariables mask related stuff),
cl_target_option_restore gets:
+ opts->x_ix86_abi = ptr->x_ix86_abi;
...
+ opts_set->x_ix86_abi = static_cast<enum calling_abi>((mask & 1) != 0);
+ mask >>= 1;
plus the movements in other functions too. So, by it being a
TargetVariable, the only thing that changed is that we don't need to
handle it manually in ix86_function_specific_{save,restore} because it
is handled automatically including the opts_set stuff.
2022-11-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/106875
* config/i386/i386.opt (x_ix86_abi): Remove TargetSave.
(ix86_abi): Replace it with TargetVariable.
* config/i386/i386-options.cc (ix86_function_specific_save,
ix86_function_specific_restore): Don't save and restore x_ix86_abi.
* g++.target/i386/pr106875.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/106875] [11/12 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save with -mabi=ms -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and "#pragma GCC target" since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd
2022-09-07 17:17 [Bug c++/106875] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 gscfq@t-online.de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-28 9:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-28 9:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-10 17:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-28 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |[11/12 Regression] ICE in
|in |ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_
|ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_ |save with -mabi=ms
|save with -mabi=ms |-mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and
|-mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and |"#pragma GCC target" since
|"#pragma GCC target" since |r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd
|r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd |
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on the trunk for now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/106875] [11/12 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save with -mabi=ms -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and "#pragma GCC target" since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd
2022-09-07 17:17 [Bug c++/106875] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 gscfq@t-online.de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-11-28 9:22 ` [Bug target/106875] [11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-02-10 17:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-10 17:57 ` [Bug target/106875] [11 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-02-10 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85a84ce2e502b820277dbb399c43d4ced291efca
commit r12-9123-g85a84ce2e502b820277dbb399c43d4ced291efca
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Nov 28 10:13:43 2022 +0100
i386: Fix up ix86_abi handling [PR106875]
The following testcase fails since my changes to make also
opts_set saved/restored upon function target/optimization changes
(before it has been acting as "has this option be ever explicit
anywhere?").
The problem is that for ix86_abi we depend on the opts_set
value for it in ix86_option_override_internal:
SET_OPTION_IF_UNSET (opts, opts_set, ix86_abi, DEFAULT_ABI);
but as it is a TargetSave, the backend code is required to
save/restore it manually (it does that) and since gcc 11 also
to save/restore the opts_set bit for it (which isn't done).
We don't do that for various other TargetSave which
ix86_function_specific_{save,restore} saves/restores, but as long
as we never test opts_set for it, it doesn't really matter.
One possible fix would be to introduce some new TargetSave into
which ix86_function_specific_{save,restore} would save/restore a bitmask
of the opts_set bits. The following patch uses an easier fix, by
making it a TargetVariable instead the saving/restoring is handled
by the generated code.
The differences in options.h are just slight movements on where
*ix86_abi stuff appears in it, ditto for options.cc, the real
differences are just in options-save.cc, where cl_target_option_save
gets:
+ ptr->x_ix86_abi = opts->x_ix86_abi;
...
+ if (opts_set->x_ix86_abi) mask |= HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << 3;
(plus adjustments of following TargetVariables mask related stuff),
cl_target_option_restore gets:
+ opts->x_ix86_abi = ptr->x_ix86_abi;
...
+ opts_set->x_ix86_abi = static_cast<enum calling_abi>((mask & 1) != 0);
+ mask >>= 1;
plus the movements in other functions too. So, by it being a
TargetVariable, the only thing that changed is that we don't need to
handle it manually in ix86_function_specific_{save,restore} because it
is handled automatically including the opts_set stuff.
2022-11-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/106875
* config/i386/i386.opt (x_ix86_abi): Remove TargetSave.
(ix86_abi): Replace it with TargetVariable.
* config/i386/i386-options.cc (ix86_function_specific_save,
ix86_function_specific_restore): Don't save and restore x_ix86_abi.
* g++.target/i386/pr106875.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit ee629d242d9f93a38e49bed904bb334bbe15dde1)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/106875] [11 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save with -mabi=ms -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and "#pragma GCC target" since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd
2022-09-07 17:17 [Bug c++/106875] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 gscfq@t-online.de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-10 17:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-02-10 17:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-02 20:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-03 9:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-02-10 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
|ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_ |ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_
|save with -mabi=ms |save with -mabi=ms
|-mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and |-mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and
|"#pragma GCC target" since |"#pragma GCC target" since
|r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd |r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for gcc 12.3 too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/106875] [11 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save with -mabi=ms -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and "#pragma GCC target" since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd
2022-09-07 17:17 [Bug c++/106875] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 gscfq@t-online.de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-02-10 17:57 ` [Bug target/106875] [11 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-02 20:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-03 9:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-02 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:511b878b6a808c3d46dccf806223a851e63ad562
commit r11-10685-g511b878b6a808c3d46dccf806223a851e63ad562
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Nov 28 10:13:43 2022 +0100
i386: Fix up ix86_abi handling [PR106875]
The following testcase fails since my changes to make also
opts_set saved/restored upon function target/optimization changes
(before it has been acting as "has this option be ever explicit
anywhere?").
The problem is that for ix86_abi we depend on the opts_set
value for it in ix86_option_override_internal:
SET_OPTION_IF_UNSET (opts, opts_set, ix86_abi, DEFAULT_ABI);
but as it is a TargetSave, the backend code is required to
save/restore it manually (it does that) and since gcc 11 also
to save/restore the opts_set bit for it (which isn't done).
We don't do that for various other TargetSave which
ix86_function_specific_{save,restore} saves/restores, but as long
as we never test opts_set for it, it doesn't really matter.
One possible fix would be to introduce some new TargetSave into
which ix86_function_specific_{save,restore} would save/restore a bitmask
of the opts_set bits. The following patch uses an easier fix, by
making it a TargetVariable instead the saving/restoring is handled
by the generated code.
The differences in options.h are just slight movements on where
*ix86_abi stuff appears in it, ditto for options.cc, the real
differences are just in options-save.cc, where cl_target_option_save
gets:
+ ptr->x_ix86_abi = opts->x_ix86_abi;
...
+ if (opts_set->x_ix86_abi) mask |= HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << 3;
(plus adjustments of following TargetVariables mask related stuff),
cl_target_option_restore gets:
+ opts->x_ix86_abi = ptr->x_ix86_abi;
...
+ opts_set->x_ix86_abi = static_cast<enum calling_abi>((mask & 1) != 0);
+ mask >>= 1;
plus the movements in other functions too. So, by it being a
TargetVariable, the only thing that changed is that we don't need to
handle it manually in ix86_function_specific_{save,restore} because it
is handled automatically including the opts_set stuff.
2022-11-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/106875
* config/i386/i386.opt (x_ix86_abi): Remove TargetSave.
(ix86_abi): Replace it with TargetVariable.
* config/i386/i386-options.c (ix86_function_specific_save,
ix86_function_specific_restore): Don't save and restore x_ix86_abi.
* g++.target/i386/pr106875.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit ee629d242d9f93a38e49bed904bb334bbe15dde1)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/106875] [11 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save with -mabi=ms -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and "#pragma GCC target" since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd
2022-09-07 17:17 [Bug c++/106875] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 gscfq@t-online.de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2023-05-02 20:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-03 9:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-03 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106875
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 11.4 as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-03 9:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-07 17:17 [Bug c++/106875] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-09-07 19:39 ` [Bug c++/106875] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save, at config/i386/i386.cc:8343 since r11-3183-gba948b37768c99cd marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-08 1:44 ` [Bug target/106875] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-19 6:02 ` [Bug target/106875] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save with -mabi=ms -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues and "#pragma GCC target" " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-25 16:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-28 9:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-28 9:22 ` [Bug target/106875] [11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-10 17:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-10 17:57 ` [Bug target/106875] [11 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-02 20:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-03 9:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).