public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/106999] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233
@ 2022-09-21 17:32 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-09-21 17:32 ` [Bug fortran/106999] " gscfq@t-online.de
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: gscfq@t-online.de @ 2022-09-21 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106999
Bug ID: 106999
Summary: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected
record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have
function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at
fortran/trans-expr.cc:233
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gscfq@t-online.de
Target Milestone: ---
Started with r11 before 20200503 :
$ cat z1.f90
program p
type t
procedure(g), pointer :: f
end type
class(t), allocatable :: z
call s(z%f)
contains
subroutine g(x)
class(t) :: x
end
subroutine s(x)
class(*) :: x
end
end
$ gfortran-13-20220918 -c z1.f90
$ gfortran-10 -c z1.f90
$ gfortran-10 -c z1.f90 -fcheck=all
$
$ gfortran-13-20220918 -c z1.f90 -fcheck=all
z1.f90:6:14:
6 | call s(z%f)
| 1
internal compiler error: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or
qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at
fortran/trans-expr.cc:233
0x6c055a tree_check_failed(tree_node const*, char const*, int, char const*,
...)
../../gcc/tree.cc:8827
0x8ec48b tree_check3(tree_node*, char const*, int, char const*, tree_code,
tree_code, tree_code)
../../gcc/tree.h:3560
0x8ec48b gfc_class_data_get(tree_node*)
../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc:233
0x8f6b46 gfc_conv_procedure_call(gfc_se*, gfc_symbol*, gfc_actual_arglist*,
gfc_expr*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>*)
../../gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc:7228
0x9580b0 gfc_trans_call(gfc_code*, bool, tree_node*, tree_node*, bool)
../../gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc:422
0x8b0aa6 trans_code
../../gcc/fortran/trans.cc:2018
0x8e8009 gfc_generate_function_code(gfc_namespace*)
../../gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc:7654
0x859a2e translate_all_program_units
../../gcc/fortran/parse.cc:6671
0x859a2e gfc_parse_file()
../../gcc/fortran/parse.cc:6977
0x8a7ccf gfc_be_parse_file
../../gcc/fortran/f95-lang.cc:229
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233
2022-09-21 17:32 [Bug fortran/106999] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233 gscfq@t-online.de
@ 2022-09-21 17:32 ` gscfq@t-online.de
2022-09-22 6:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: gscfq@t-online.de @ 2022-09-21 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106999
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz <gscfq@t-online.de> ---
FYI, a directly matching variant compiles :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
type t
procedure(g), pointer :: f
end type
class(t), allocatable :: z
call s(z%f)
contains
subroutine g(x)
class(t) :: x
end
subroutine s(x)
procedure(g) :: x
end
end
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233
2022-09-21 17:32 [Bug fortran/106999] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-09-21 17:32 ` [Bug fortran/106999] " gscfq@t-online.de
@ 2022-09-22 6:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-22 19:22 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-09-22 6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106999
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233
2022-09-21 17:32 [Bug fortran/106999] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-09-21 17:32 ` [Bug fortran/106999] " gscfq@t-online.de
2022-09-22 6:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-09-22 19:22 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-17 19:42 ` [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13/14 " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-09-22 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106999
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Also GCC 4.8 ICEs.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233
2022-09-21 17:32 [Bug fortran/106999] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233 gscfq@t-online.de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-09-22 19:22 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-04-17 19:42 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-29 10:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-04-17 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106999
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2023-04-17
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FWIW, it is -fcheck=pointer triggering the ICE.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233
2022-09-21 17:32 [Bug fortran/106999] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233 gscfq@t-online.de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-04-17 19:42 ` [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13/14 " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-29 10:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-31 12:16 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-29 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106999
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|11.4 |11.5
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 11.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233
2022-09-21 17:32 [Bug fortran/106999] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233 gscfq@t-online.de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-05-29 10:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-03-31 12:16 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-02 14:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-23 9:49 ` [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13 " pault at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-31 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106999
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 57838
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57838&action=edit
Fix for this PR
Thanks for the report. The attached does what is required, I believe. It is
regtesting as I write.
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233
2022-09-21 17:32 [Bug fortran/106999] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233 gscfq@t-online.de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-31 12:16 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-04-02 14:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-23 9:49 ` [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13 " pault at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-02 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106999
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7aa9455a8b9cb080649a7357b7360f2d99bcbf1
commit r14-9753-ga7aa9455a8b9cb080649a7357b7360f2d99bcbf1
Author: Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Tue Apr 2 15:53:29 2024 +0100
Fortran: Add error for subroutine passed to a variable dummy [PR106999]
2024-04-02 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
gcc/fortran
PR fortran/106999
* interface.cc (gfc_compare_interfaces): Add error for a
subroutine proc pointer passed to a variable formal.
(compare_parameter): If a procedure pointer is being passed to
a non-procedure formal arg, and there is an an interface, use
gfc_compare_interfaces to check and provide a more useful error
message.
gcc/testsuite/
PR fortran/106999
* gfortran.dg/pr106999.f90: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233
2022-09-21 17:32 [Bug fortran/106999] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233 gscfq@t-online.de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-02 14:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-04-23 9:49 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-04-23 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106999
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression] |[11/12/13 Regression] ICE
|ICE tree check: expected |tree check: expected
|record_type or union_type |record_type or union_type
|or qual_union_type, have |or qual_union_type, have
|function_type in |function_type in
|gfc_class_data_get, at |gfc_class_data_get, at
|fortran/trans-expr.cc:233 |fortran/trans-expr.cc:233
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Needs backporting. Changed summary.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-23 9:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-21 17:32 [Bug fortran/106999] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_class_data_get, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:233 gscfq@t-online.de
2022-09-21 17:32 ` [Bug fortran/106999] " gscfq@t-online.de
2022-09-22 6:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-22 19:22 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-17 19:42 ` [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13/14 " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-29 10:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-31 12:16 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-02 14:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-23 9:49 ` [Bug fortran/106999] [11/12/13 " pault at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).