public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 08:42:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107569-4-Vd69jpiK3H@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107569-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569

--- Comment #37 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d5c4a16dd833aa083f13dd3e78e3ef38afe6ebb

commit r13-3924-g2d5c4a16dd833aa083f13dd3e78e3ef38afe6ebb
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Sat Nov 12 09:35:16 2022 +0100

    range-op: Implement floating point division fold_range [PR107569]

    Here is the floating point division fold_range implementation,
    as I wrote in the last mail, we could outline some of the common parts
    into static methods with descriptive names and share them between
    foperator_div and foperator_mult.

    Regressions are
    +FAIL: gcc.dg/pr95115.c execution test
    +FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/math/hardware.d execution test
    +FAIL: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/math/hardware.d execution test
    The first test is we have:
      # RANGE [frange] double [] +-NAN
      _3 =  Inf /  Inf;
      if (_3 ord _3)
        goto <bb 3>; [INV]
      else
        goto <bb 4>; [INV]

      <bb 3> :
      abort ();

      <bb 4> :
    before evrp, the range is correct, Inf / Inf is known NAN of unknown
    sign.  evrp correctly folds _3 ord _3 into false and the
      _3 =  Inf /  Inf;
    remains in the IL, but then comes dse1 and removes it as dead
    statement.  So, I think yet another example of the PR107608 problems
    where DCE? removes dead statements which raise floating point exceptions.
    And -fno-delete-dead-exceptions doesn't help.

    2022-11-12  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR tree-optimization/107569
            * range-op-float.cc (foperator_div): New class.
            (floating_op_table::floating_op_table): Use foperator_div
            for RDIV_EXPR.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-12  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-08 12:09 [Bug tree-optimization/107569] New: " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 12:09 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107569] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 12:59 ` pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com
2022-11-08 13:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 13:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 14:46 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2022-11-08 14:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 15:14 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2022-11-08 15:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 15:53 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2022-11-08 15:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 16:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 17:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 14:20 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 14:27 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 14:30 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 15:01 ` pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com
2022-11-09 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 15:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 17:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 18:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10  9:32 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10  9:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 10:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 10:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 10:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 11:34 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 11:34 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 12:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 12:47 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 12:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 13:19 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 13:35 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 16:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 17:50 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 19:14 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 19:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-11  7:15 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-12  8:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-12  8:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-11-12  8:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-30  1:43 ` romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
2022-12-08 16:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-08 16:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-08 16:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-09 15:34 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-02-27 10:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-22 15:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-22 16:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23  8:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23 13:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23 14:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23 16:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23 16:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-107569-4-Vd69jpiK3H@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).