public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 17:21:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107569-4-ktBgXj5Vny@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107569-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4eadbe80060ab6c45193a1a57fac84b035e1c328
commit r13-3860-g4eadbe80060ab6c45193a1a57fac84b035e1c328
Author: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Nov 9 16:05:08 2022 +0100
Clear NAN when reading back a global range if necessary.
When reading back from the global store, we must clear the NAN bit if
necessary. The reason it's not happening is because the constructor
sets a NAN by default (when HONOR_NANS). We must be careful to clear
the NAN bit if the original range didn't have a NAN.
I have commented the reason we use the constructor instead of filling
out the fields by hand, because it wasn't clear at re-reading this
code.
PR 107569/tree-optimization
gcc/ChangeLog:
* value-range-storage.cc (frange_storage_slot::get_frange): Clear
NAN if appropriate.
* value-range.cc (range_tests_floats): New test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-09 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-08 12:09 [Bug tree-optimization/107569] New: " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 12:09 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107569] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 12:59 ` pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com
2022-11-08 13:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 13:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 14:46 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2022-11-08 14:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 15:14 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2022-11-08 15:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 15:53 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2022-11-08 15:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 16:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-08 17:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 14:20 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 14:27 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 14:30 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 15:01 ` pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com
2022-11-09 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 15:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 17:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-11-09 18:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 9:32 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 9:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 10:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 10:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 10:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 11:34 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 11:34 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 12:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 12:47 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 12:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 13:19 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 13:35 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 16:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 17:50 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 19:14 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10 19:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-11 7:15 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-12 8:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-12 8:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-12 8:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-30 1:43 ` romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
2022-12-08 16:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-08 16:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-08 16:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-09 15:34 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-02-27 10:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-22 15:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-22 16:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23 8:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23 13:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23 14:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23 16:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23 16:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-107569-4-ktBgXj5Vny@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).