public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107692] [13 regression] r13-3950-g071e428c24ee8c breaks many test cases
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 06:11:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107692-4-964DzzejtF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107692

Jiu Fu Guo <guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jiu Fu Guo <guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hongyu Wang from comment #2)
> Created attachment 53897 [details]
> A patch
> 
> Sorry for introducing these fails. Here is the patch.
> 
> I've tested the patch with cross-compler and all the fails disappeared, but
> I don't have a powerpc to do full bootstrap & regtest (I'm still applying
> for gcc farm account).
> 
> I'll send out the patch after I can access gcc farm for a power machine, or
> hopefully someone can help testing the patch.
> 
> I suppose s390 has similar issue and I will update that accordingly.
Hi,

One small comment, for code "if (!(flag_unroll_loops ||
flag_unroll_all_loops))"
we may need to add one more condition "|| loop->unroll", like what does in
r13-3950 for i386.cc.  Otherwise, unroll pragma may be affected.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-18  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-14 21:20 [Bug target/107692] New: " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-14 21:51 ` [Bug target/107692] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-15  5:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-15  7:02 ` wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com
2022-11-15 11:49 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-16 13:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-18  6:11 ` guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-11-18  6:13 ` guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-18  7:07 ` wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com
2022-11-18 13:35 ` guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-18 14:11 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-18 14:12 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-18 19:37 ` wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com
2022-11-18 21:44 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-24  1:20 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-24  1:22 ` wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com
2022-12-19 22:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-107692-4-964DzzejtF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).