public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
@ 2023-05-11 7:53 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 7:54 ` [Bug libstdc++/109808] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808
Bug ID: 109808
Summary: [12 regression] FAIL:
libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with
_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I'm seeing this subtest FAIL with the following in the log on the GCC 12 branch
when configured for the dual-ABI but defaulting to the C++11 ABI. It works
fine when defaulting to gcc4-compat. r12-9300-g0a6e26e7979805 removed
a #define to zero here.
$12 = Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'> No type named
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Manager_internal<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >>.: ^M
got: $12 = Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'> No type named
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Manager_internal<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >>.: ^M
FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as
Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'> No type named
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Manager_internal<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >>.: ^M
skipping: Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'> No type named
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Manager_internal<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >>.: ^M
{_M_manager = 0x40289c
<std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Manager_internal<std::string>::_S_manage(std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Op,
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any const*,
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Arg*)>, _M_storage = {_M_ptr =
0x41acf8, _M_buffer = {__data = "\370\254A\000\000\000\000", __align = {<No
data fields>}}}}^M
skipping: {_M_manager = 0x40289c
<std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Manager_internal<std::string>::_S_manage(std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Op,
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any const*,
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Arg*)>, _M_storage = {_M_ptr =
0x41acf8, _M_buffer = {__data = "\370\254A\000\000\000\000", __align = {<No
data fields>}}}}^M
$13 = std::experimental::any containing const char * = {[contained value] =
0x404555 "stringiest"}^M
got: $13 = std::experimental::any containing const char * = {[contained value]
= 0x404555 "stringiest"}^M
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
2023-05-11 7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-11 7:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 7:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |testsuite-fail
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
CC| |fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
2023-05-11 7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 7:54 ` [Bug libstdc++/109808] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-11 7:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 8:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
correction, I see it when defaulting to the non-C++11 ABI.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
2023-05-11 7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 7:54 ` [Bug libstdc++/109808] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 7:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-11 8:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 8:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Is this really a 12 regression? I think it's failed that way for some time when
using the old ABI, it's just that nobody except me tests it that way :-)
I think it was fixed on trunk by r13-4080-g2b7f0378b915a6 and backported as
r12-9301-g0970eafdc61d75
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
2023-05-11 7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-05-11 8:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-11 8:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 8:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> I think it was fixed on trunk by r13-4080-g2b7f0378b915a6 and backported as
> r12-9301-g0970eafdc61d75
At least, I don't see a failure for that test since that commit (which is why
it removed the define).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
2023-05-11 7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-05-11 8:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-11 8:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 9:11 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 8:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2023-05-11
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah I see the problem, we need to backport r13-4091-g3c54805d03ac1b too. Not
sure why I don't see a failure though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
2023-05-11 7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-05-11 8:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-11 9:11 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 8:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Backported as r12-9530-g16a76499f916b5 so I hope this is fixed now (I still
can't reproduce it even with a --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible
build).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
2023-05-11 7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-05-11 9:11 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-15 8:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-15 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The failures are gone, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-15 8:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-11 7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 7:54 ` [Bug libstdc++/109808] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 7:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 8:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 8:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 8:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 9:11 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 8:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).