public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
@ 2023-05-11  7:53 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-05-11  7:54 ` [Bug libstdc++/109808] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11  7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808

            Bug ID: 109808
           Summary: [12 regression] FAIL:
                    libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with
                    _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

I'm seeing this subtest FAIL with the following in the log on the GCC 12 branch
when configured for the dual-ABI but defaulting to the C++11 ABI.  It works
fine when defaulting to gcc4-compat.  r12-9300-g0a6e26e7979805 removed
a #define to zero here.

$12 = Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'> No type named
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Manager_internal<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >>.: ^M
got: $12 = Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'> No type named
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Manager_internal<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >>.: ^M
FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as
Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'> No type named
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Manager_internal<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >>.: ^M
skipping: Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'> No type named
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Manager_internal<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >>.: ^M
{_M_manager = 0x40289c
<std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Manager_internal<std::string>::_S_manage(std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Op,
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any const*,
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Arg*)>, _M_storage = {_M_ptr =
0x41acf8, _M_buffer = {__data = "\370\254A\000\000\000\000", __align = {<No
data fields>}}}}^M
skipping: {_M_manager = 0x40289c
<std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Manager_internal<std::string>::_S_manage(std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Op,
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any const*,
std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::any::_Arg*)>, _M_storage = {_M_ptr =
0x41acf8, _M_buffer = {__data = "\370\254A\000\000\000\000", __align = {<No
data fields>}}}}^M
$13 = std::experimental::any containing const char * = {[contained value] =
0x404555 "stringiest"}^M
got: $13 = std::experimental::any containing const char * = {[contained value]
= 0x404555 "stringiest"}^M

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
  2023-05-11  7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-11  7:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-05-11  7:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11  7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |testsuite-fail
   Target Milestone|---                         |12.4
                 CC|                            |fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
  2023-05-11  7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-05-11  7:54 ` [Bug libstdc++/109808] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-11  7:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-05-11  8:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11  7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
correction, I see it when defaulting to the non-C++11 ABI.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
  2023-05-11  7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-05-11  7:54 ` [Bug libstdc++/109808] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-05-11  7:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-11  8:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-05-11  8:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11  8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Is this really a 12 regression? I think it's failed that way for some time when
using the old ABI, it's just that nobody except me tests it that way :-)

I think it was fixed on trunk by r13-4080-g2b7f0378b915a6 and backported as
r12-9301-g0970eafdc61d75

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
  2023-05-11  7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-11  8:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-11  8:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-05-11  8:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11  8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> I think it was fixed on trunk by r13-4080-g2b7f0378b915a6 and backported as
> r12-9301-g0970eafdc61d75

At least, I don't see a failure for that test since that commit (which is why
it removed the define).

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
  2023-05-11  7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-11  8:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-11  8:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-05-11  9:11 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-05-15  8:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11  8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-05-11
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah I see the problem, we need to backport r13-4091-g3c54805d03ac1b too. Not
sure why I don't see a failure though.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
  2023-05-11  7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-11  8:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-11  9:11 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-05-15  8:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-11  9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Backported as r12-9530-g16a76499f916b5 so I hope this is fixed now (I still
can't reproduce it even with a --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible
build).

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/109808] [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0
  2023-05-11  7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-11  9:11 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-15  8:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-15  8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109808

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The failures are gone, thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-15  8:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-11  7:53 [Bug libstdc++/109808] New: [12 regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/libfundts.cc print as with _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11  7:54 ` [Bug libstdc++/109808] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11  7:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11  8:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11  8:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11  8:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11  9:11 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15  8:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).