public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/109880] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09
@ 2023-05-16 22:11 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-17 1:18 ` [Bug testsuite/109880] " bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-16 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880
Bug ID: 109880
Summary: [14 regression]
gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails
after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:9417b30499ce09996b4f1b4e2ce75a2853865ed4, r14-916-g9417b30499ce09
make -k check-gcc
RUNTESTFLAGS="powerpc.exp=gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c"
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c scan-assembler-times
\\mrldicl\\M 7
# of expected passes 11
# of unexpected failures 1
The test case may just need updating. The ones that count assembler
instructions can be fragile.
commit 9417b30499ce09996b4f1b4e2ce75a2853865ed4 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
Author: <E2><80><9C>Ajit Kumar Agarwal<E2><80><9D> <aagarwa1@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue May 16 10:47:15 2023 -0500
rs6000: Enable REE pass by default
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/109880] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09
2023-05-16 22:11 [Bug testsuite/109880] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-17 1:18 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-18 10:17 ` aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-17 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880
Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed| |2023-05-17
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. The difference I see is:
gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c: \\mrldicl\\M found 5 times
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c scan-assembler-times
\\mrldicl\\M 7
...which makes sense, since the rldicl is used as a zero extend, so it does
look like just an instruction count update is needed.
Ajit, can you please confirm the 2 missing rldicl were removed because of zero
extends? Bill's build seems pretty normal, so did you not see this failure
during your testing?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/109880] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09
2023-05-16 22:11 [Bug testsuite/109880] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-17 1:18 ` [Bug testsuite/109880] " bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-18 10:17 ` aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-13 8:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-18 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880
--- Comment #2 from Ajit Kumar Agarwal <aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes these are redundant zero extend and can be removed.
I will update the tests and send the patch for review.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/109880] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09
2023-05-16 22:11 [Bug testsuite/109880] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-17 1:18 ` [Bug testsuite/109880] " bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-18 10:17 ` aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-06-13 8:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-15 6:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-17 2:25 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-13 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Ajit Kumar Agarwal <aagarwa@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17714c08e9013b51cf8d04ac39f844d355c923f2
commit r14-1777-g17714c08e9013b51cf8d04ac39f844d355c923f2
Author: âAjit Kumar Agarwalâ <aagarwa1@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri May 19 02:30:44 2023 -0500
testsuite: Update powerpc test fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c
Update powerpc tests with extra zero_extend removal with default ree pass.
2023-06-13 Ajit Kumar Agarwal <aagarwa1@linux.ibm.com>
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR testsuite/109880
* gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c: Update test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/109880] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09
2023-05-16 22:11 [Bug testsuite/109880] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-06-13 8:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-15 6:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-17 2:25 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-15 6:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Has this been fixed with the commit?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/109880] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09
2023-05-16 22:11 [Bug testsuite/109880] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-07-15 6:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-17 2:25 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-17 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880
Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Has this been fixed with the commit?
Yeah, marking it resolved, thanks for reminding.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-17 2:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-16 22:11 [Bug testsuite/109880] New: [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-17 1:18 ` [Bug testsuite/109880] " bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-18 10:17 ` aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-13 8:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-15 6:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-17 2:25 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).