public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
@ 2023-05-17 21:16 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
2023-05-17 21:20 ` [Bug c++/109899] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 more replies)
0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com @ 2023-05-17 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
Bug ID: 109899
Summary: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 55106
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55106&action=edit
Preprocessed source causing the bug
Repro:
#include <array>
#include <string>
#include <boost/pfr.hpp>
struct T {
struct {
// Works fine for value == std::array<int, 5> or std::string directly
std::array<std::string, 5> value;
} X;
};
int main() {
boost::pfr::detail::fields_count<T>();
}
On godbolt: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/xd48obMTv
Preprocessed source attached.
g++ 13.1.1 up-to-date in Arch Linux as of today, and it fails on any Boost
version that has <boost/pfr.hpp> (from 1.75 to 1.82+).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
@ 2023-05-17 21:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-17 22:38 ` [Bug c++/109899] [12/13/14 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-17 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reducing ...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
2023-05-17 21:20 ` [Bug c++/109899] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-17 22:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-17 22:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-17 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2023-05-17
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
Known to work| |11.3.0
Summary|ICE in check_noexcept_r, at |[12/13/14 Regression] ICE
|cp/except.cc:1065 |in check_noexcept_r, at
| |cp/except.cc:1065
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |12.1.0
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reduced testcase to this valid testcase:
```
class class0 {
~class0() noexcept {}
friend class class1;
};
struct class1 {
class0 field0;
class1();
~class1();
};
template <typename T> using array = T[1];
template <int N>
auto f1() noexcept
-> decltype(sizeof(array<class1>{}));
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
2023-05-17 21:20 ` [Bug c++/109899] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-17 22:38 ` [Bug c++/109899] [12/13/14 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-17 22:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-18 6:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-17 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
A little further reduced:
```
struct class1 {
class1();
~class1();
};
template <typename T> using array = T[1];
template <int N>
auto f1() -> decltype(sizeof(array<class1>{}));
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-05-17 22:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-18 6:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-18 13:23 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-18 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-05-18 6:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-18 13:23 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-18 13:25 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-18 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Seems to have started with r12-7069:
commit 119cea98f664764cce04963243c39c8f6d797d33
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Feb 2 18:36:41 2022 -0500
c++: assignment, aggregate, array [PR104300]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-05-18 13:23 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-05-18 13:25 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-26 5:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-05-18 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(gdb) up
#1 0x0000000000e5de6f in check_noexcept_r (tp=0x7fffffffa0a8,
walk_subtrees=0x7fffffff9f94)
at /home/mpolacek/src/gcc/gcc/cp/except.cc:1065
1065 gcc_assert (INDIRECT_TYPE_P (type));
(gdb) p type
$1 = <method_type 0x7fffea3c4dc8>
(gdb) pge
void class1::<T40f> (struct class1 *)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-05-18 13:25 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-26 5:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-26 5:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-26 5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cuzdav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 110810 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-07-26 5:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-26 5:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-05 23:34 ` lozko.roma at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-26 5:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reduced further (which shows PR 110810 is the same here):
```
struct class1 {
class1();
~class1();
};
using array = class1[1];
template <int N>
void f()
{
array{};
}
```
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-07-26 5:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-05 23:34 ` lozko.roma at gmail dot com
2024-01-15 21:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: lozko.roma at gmail dot com @ 2024-01-05 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
Roman Lozko <lozko.roma at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lozko.roma at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from Roman Lozko <lozko.roma at gmail dot com> ---
Found this issue after reducing my example with GCC 13.2 to be an exact copy of
previous comment. Dunno how to help so just notifying that the bug still
exists, I guess.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-05 23:34 ` lozko.roma at gmail dot com
@ 2024-01-15 21:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 21:52 ` [Bug c++/109899] [12/13 " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-15 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d33c3b5ac9b9b3e314ae9118d483ade7e91a80a5
commit r14-7260-gd33c3b5ac9b9b3e314ae9118d483ade7e91a80a5
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Jan 15 16:49:19 2024 -0500
c++: non-dep array list-init w/ non-triv dtor [PR109899]
The get_target_expr call added in r12-7069-g119cea98f66476 causes us
for the below testcase to call build_vec_delete in a template context,
which builds a templated destructor call and checks expr_noexcept_p for
it, which ICEs because the call has templated form.
Much of the work of build_vec_delete however is code generation and thus
will just get discarded in a template context, and that includes the
code guarded by expr_noexcept_p. So this patch narrowly fixes this ICE
by eliding the expr_noexcept_p call when in a template context.
PR c++/109899
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* init.cc (build_vec_delete_1): Assume expr_noexcept_p returns
false in a template context.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-array21.C: New test.
Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-15 21:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-15 21:52 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 21:52 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-15 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] ICE |[12/13 Regression] ICE in
|in check_noexcept_r, at |check_noexcept_r, at
|cp/except.cc:1065 |cp/except.cc:1065
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-15 21:52 ` [Bug c++/109899] [12/13 " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-15 21:52 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 22:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-15 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-15 21:52 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-15 22:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 23:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 23:09 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-15 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
<ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:766ea9da8ccff3786ec5df414046f6b1640e7e01
commit r13-8224-g766ea9da8ccff3786ec5df414046f6b1640e7e01
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Jan 15 16:49:19 2024 -0500
c++: non-dep array list-init w/ non-triv dtor [PR109899]
The get_target_expr call added in r12-7069-g119cea98f66476 causes us
for the below testcase to call build_vec_delete in a template context,
which builds a templated destructor call and checks expr_noexcept_p for
it, which ICEs because the call has templated form.
Much of the work of build_vec_delete however is code generation and thus
will just get discarded in a template context, and that includes the
code guarded by expr_noexcept_p. So this patch narrowly fixes this ICE
by eliding the expr_noexcept_p call when in a template context.
PR c++/109899
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* init.cc (build_vec_delete_1): Assume expr_noexcept_p returns
false in a template context.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-array21.C: New test.
Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit d33c3b5ac9b9b3e314ae9118d483ade7e91a80a5)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-15 22:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-15 23:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 23:09 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-15 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
<ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6477b3b9c3e5be5dfe549dcb7b3cef2b49e3690c
commit r12-10098-g6477b3b9c3e5be5dfe549dcb7b3cef2b49e3690c
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Jan 15 16:49:19 2024 -0500
c++: non-dep array list-init w/ non-triv dtor [PR109899]
The get_target_expr call added in r12-7069-g119cea98f66476 causes us
for the below testcase to call build_vec_delete in a template context,
which builds a templated destructor call and checks expr_noexcept_p for
it, which ICEs because the call has templated form.
Much of the work of build_vec_delete however is code generation and thus
will just get discarded in a template context, and that includes the
code guarded by expr_noexcept_p. So this patch narrowly fixes this ICE
by eliding the expr_noexcept_p call when in a template context.
PR c++/109899
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* init.cc (build_vec_delete_1): Assume expr_noexcept_p returns
false in a template context.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist-array21.C: New test.
Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit d33c3b5ac9b9b3e314ae9118d483ade7e91a80a5)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/109899] [12/13 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-15 23:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-01-15 23:09 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-01-15 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109899
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 12.4 / 13.3 / 14, thanks for the bug report.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-15 23:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-17 21:16 [Bug c++/109899] New: ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1065 jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com
2023-05-17 21:20 ` [Bug c++/109899] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-17 22:38 ` [Bug c++/109899] [12/13/14 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-17 22:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-18 6:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-18 13:23 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-18 13:25 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-26 5:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-26 5:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-05 23:34 ` lozko.roma at gmail dot com
2024-01-15 21:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 21:52 ` [Bug c++/109899] [12/13 " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 21:52 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 22:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 23:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 23:09 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).