public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "malat at debian dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/111591] ppc64be: miscompilation with -mstrict-align / -O3
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 07:32:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-111591-4-tObdZLaZTP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-111591-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111591
--- Comment #36 from Mathieu Malaterre <malat at debian dot org> ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #32)
[...]
> So IMHO #c1 test case is problematic, hi @Mathieu, could you have a double
> check?
I vaguely recall crafting this test-case with cvise with gcc-13. This is why it
is using some kind of gcc-13 specific `__remove_reference`. I cannot verify the
code using clang because of this. I also do not see anything wrong under
valgrind.
If the other test-case(s) (also cvise-reduced) is/are now working I would say
let's close this one as fixed and if it re-appear in the original highway
source code, I'll re-run yet another cvise reduction.
Thanks everyone for your work ! Very much appreciated.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-15 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-25 11:53 [Bug target/111591] New: " malat at debian dot org
2023-09-25 11:55 ` [Bug target/111591] " malat at debian dot org
2023-09-25 11:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-25 12:20 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-09-25 13:15 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-09-25 13:41 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-09-26 6:50 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-26 7:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-26 8:14 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-26 9:28 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-09-26 9:28 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-09-26 9:31 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-09-26 9:31 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-09-27 9:24 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-27 9:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-28 0:20 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-13 10:19 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-13 11:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-13 12:09 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-13 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-16 9:11 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-19 7:27 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-19 11:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-19 11:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-20 5:53 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-20 6:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-23 3:21 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-23 9:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-23 12:36 ` matz at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-23 13:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-23 14:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-24 2:59 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-31 6:40 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-13 8:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-13 8:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-13 8:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-15 7:32 ` malat at debian dot org [this message]
2023-12-15 7:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-15 10:01 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-15 10:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-15 11:28 ` malat at debian dot org
2023-12-15 11:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-18 6:01 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-18 6:03 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-19 5:38 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-111591-4-tObdZLaZTP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).