public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/111787] New: [14 regression] xxx breaks build
@ 2023-10-12 15:08 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-10-12 15:11 ` [Bug bootstrap/111787] [14 regression] r14-4592-g0d00385eaf72cc " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-10-12 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111787

            Bug ID: 111787
           Summary: [14 regression] xxx breaks build
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

g:0d00385eaf72ccacff17935b0d214a26773e095f, r14-4592-g0d00385eaf72cc 

g++ -c   -g -O2     -DIN_GCC    -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wconditionally-supported
-Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros
-Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -DGENERATOR_FILE -I.
-Ibuild -I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/build
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/../include 
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/../libcpp/include  \
        -o build/gencondmd.o build/gencondmd.cc
In file included from /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/recog.h:24,
                 from build/gencondmd.cc:40:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-trunk/gcc/tree.h:6296:10: error: template argument
'wi::int_traits<wi::extended_tree<N> >::precision_type' involves template
parameter(s)
   struct ints_for <generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N> >,
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      int_traits <extended_tree <N> >::precision_type>
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[2]: *** [Makefile:2951: build/gencondmd.o] Error 1


commit 0d00385eaf72ccacff17935b0d214a26773e095f (HEAD)
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Oct 12 16:01:12 2023 +0200

    wide-int: Allow up to 16320 bits wide_int and change widest_int precision
to 32640 bits [PR102989]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/111787] [14 regression] r14-4592-g0d00385eaf72cc  breaks build
  2023-10-12 15:08 [Bug bootstrap/111787] New: [14 regression] xxx breaks build seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-10-12 15:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-10-12 15:23 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-10-12 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111787

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Does
2023-10-12  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

        PR bootstrap/111787
        * tree.h (wi::int_traits <unextended_tree>::needs_write_val_arg): New
        static data member.
        (int_traits <extended_tree <N>>::needs_write_val_arg): Likewise.
        (wi::ints_for): Provide separate partial specializations for
        generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N>> and INL_CONST_PRECISION or that
        and CONST_PRECISION, rather than using
        int_traits <extended_tree <N> >::precision_type as the second template
        argument.
        * rtl.h (wi::int_traits <rtx_mode_t>::needs_write_val_arg): New
        static data member.
        * double-int.h (wi::int_traits <double_int>::needs_write_val_arg):
        Likewise.

--- gcc/tree.h.jj       2023-10-12 16:01:04.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/tree.h  2023-10-12 16:52:51.977954615 +0200
@@ -6237,6 +6237,7 @@ namespace wi
     static const enum precision_type precision_type = VAR_PRECISION;
     static const bool host_dependent_precision = false;
     static const bool is_sign_extended = false;
+    static const bool needs_write_val_arg = false;
   };

   template <int N>
@@ -6262,6 +6263,7 @@ namespace wi
       = N == ADDR_MAX_PRECISION ? INL_CONST_PRECISION : CONST_PRECISION;
     static const bool host_dependent_precision = false;
     static const bool is_sign_extended = true;
+    static const bool needs_write_val_arg = false;
     static const unsigned int precision = N;
   };

@@ -6293,8 +6295,14 @@ namespace wi
   tree_to_poly_wide_ref to_poly_wide (const_tree);

   template <int N>
-  struct ints_for <generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N> >,
-                  int_traits <extended_tree <N> >::precision_type>
+  struct ints_for <generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N> >, INL_CONST_PRECISION>
+  {
+    typedef generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N> > extended;
+    static extended zero (const extended &);
+  };
+
+  template <int N>
+  struct ints_for <generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N> >, CONST_PRECISION>
   {
     typedef generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N> > extended;
     static extended zero (const extended &);
@@ -6532,8 +6540,15 @@ wi::to_poly_wide (const_tree t)
 template <int N>
 inline generic_wide_int <wi::extended_tree <N> >
 wi::ints_for <generic_wide_int <wi::extended_tree <N> >,
-             wi::int_traits <wi::extended_tree <N> >::precision_type
-            >::zero (const extended &x)
+             wi::INL_CONST_PRECISION>::zero (const extended &x)
+{
+  return build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (x.get_tree ()));
+}
+
+template <int N>
+inline generic_wide_int <wi::extended_tree <N> >
+wi::ints_for <generic_wide_int <wi::extended_tree <N> >,
+             wi::CONST_PRECISION>::zero (const extended &x)
 {
   return build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (x.get_tree ()));
 }
--- gcc/rtl.h.jj        2023-09-29 22:04:44.463012421 +0200
+++ gcc/rtl.h   2023-10-12 16:54:59.915240074 +0200
@@ -2270,6 +2270,7 @@ namespace wi
     /* This ought to be true, except for the special case that BImode
        is canonicalized to STORE_FLAG_VALUE, which might be 1.  */
     static const bool is_sign_extended = false;
+    static const bool needs_write_val_arg = false;
     static unsigned int get_precision (const rtx_mode_t &);
     static wi::storage_ref decompose (HOST_WIDE_INT *, unsigned int,
                                      const rtx_mode_t &);
--- gcc/double-int.h.jj 2023-10-12 16:01:04.260164202 +0200
+++ gcc/double-int.h    2023-10-12 16:53:41.401292272 +0200
@@ -442,6 +442,7 @@ namespace wi
   {
     static const enum precision_type precision_type = INL_CONST_PRECISION;
     static const bool host_dependent_precision = true;
+    static const bool needs_write_val_arg = false;
     static const unsigned int precision = HOST_BITS_PER_DOUBLE_INT;
     static unsigned int get_precision (const double_int &);
     static wi::storage_ref decompose (HOST_WIDE_INT *, unsigned int,
fix this?
It works for me in stage3 gcc subdir, but that worked fine without it too (I've
been using g++ 12 as stage1 compiler).

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/111787] [14 regression] r14-4592-g0d00385eaf72cc  breaks build
  2023-10-12 15:08 [Bug bootstrap/111787] New: [14 regression] xxx breaks build seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-10-12 15:11 ` [Bug bootstrap/111787] [14 regression] r14-4592-g0d00385eaf72cc " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-10-12 15:23 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-10-12 15:24 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-10-13  6:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-10-12 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111787

--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This system is on RHEL 8 which has gcc 8.5 as the distro compiler.

And yes, the patch worked.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/111787] [14 regression] r14-4592-g0d00385eaf72cc  breaks build
  2023-10-12 15:08 [Bug bootstrap/111787] New: [14 regression] xxx breaks build seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-10-12 15:11 ` [Bug bootstrap/111787] [14 regression] r14-4592-g0d00385eaf72cc " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-10-12 15:23 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-10-12 15:24 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-10-13  6:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-10-12 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111787

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53a94071fa9e90e268a94adbdc903bd868ddeec1

commit r14-4596-g53a94071fa9e90e268a94adbdc903bd868ddeec1
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Oct 12 17:20:36 2023 +0200

    wide-int: Fix build with gcc < 12 or clang++ [PR111787]

    While my wide_int patch bootstrapped/regtested fine when I used GCC 12
    as system gcc, apparently it doesn't with GCC 11 and older or clang++.
    For GCC before PR96555 C++ DR1315 implementation the compiler complains
    about template argument involving template parameters, for clang++ the
    same + complains about missing needs_write_val_arg static data member
    in some wi::int_traits specializations.

    2023-10-12  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR bootstrap/111787
            * tree.h (wi::int_traits <unextended_tree>::needs_write_val_arg):
New
            static data member.
            (int_traits <extended_tree <N>>::needs_write_val_arg): Likewise.
            (wi::ints_for): Provide separate partial specializations for
            generic_wide_int <extended_tree <N>> and INL_CONST_PRECISION or
that
            and CONST_PRECISION, rather than using
            int_traits <extended_tree <N> >::precision_type as the second
template
            argument.
            * rtl.h (wi::int_traits <rtx_mode_t>::needs_write_val_arg): New
            static data member.
            * double-int.h (wi::int_traits <double_int>::needs_write_val_arg):
            Likewise.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/111787] [14 regression] r14-4592-g0d00385eaf72cc  breaks build
  2023-10-12 15:08 [Bug bootstrap/111787] New: [14 regression] xxx breaks build seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-10-12 15:24 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-10-13  6:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-10-13  6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111787

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
   Target Milestone|---                         |14.0

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-13  6:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-10-12 15:08 [Bug bootstrap/111787] New: [14 regression] xxx breaks build seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-12 15:11 ` [Bug bootstrap/111787] [14 regression] r14-4592-g0d00385eaf72cc " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-12 15:23 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-12 15:24 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-13  6:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).